
“The Supreme Court said a Florida property owner may be owed compensation from a government agency that refused to award him a development permit for his land. The legal issue was whether the agency’s action constituted a ‘taking’ subject to compensation, under the so-called takings clause of the Fifth Amendment, in a more than 18-year battle by Koontz and his late father over their nearly 15-acre parcel of land. After Florida designated much of the parcel as protected wetlands, Koontz proposed to develop about a quarter of it and dedicate the rest for conservation, only to have local officials insist that he pay money to protect wetlands elsewhere.”
Related posts:
California says will block crude oil from Trump offshore drilling plan
First lawsuit filed for children of drug users under Drug Dealer Liability Act
Utah launches new federalism commission to push back Washington
Gold's rebound: Why it's believable this time
Egypt’s political chaos decimates historical treasures
Saudi princess snaps up luxurious Geneva estate for $62 million
Bitcoins made simple: Go to an ATM
The Men Who Owned Bitcoin.com
As Congress fights over budget, federal agencies go on shopping sprees
Iranian-Canadians fume as TD closes accounts
Europe counts the value of prostitution, drugs to bolster GDP
Raul Castro promises end of an era in Cuba as he steps down as country’s president
Calgary student, 13, reprimanded for defending his classmate against a knife-wielding bully
Report: Homeschooling Growing Seven Times Faster than Public School Enrollment
Why Are So Many College Graduates Driving Taxis?