“The Supreme Court said a Florida property owner may be owed compensation from a government agency that refused to award him a development permit for his land. The legal issue was whether the agency’s action constituted a ‘taking’ subject to compensation, under the so-called takings clause of the Fifth Amendment, in a more than 18-year battle by Koontz and his late father over their nearly 15-acre parcel of land. After Florida designated much of the parcel as protected wetlands, Koontz proposed to develop about a quarter of it and dedicate the rest for conservation, only to have local officials insist that he pay money to protect wetlands elsewhere.”
Related posts:
Amazon’s next move: From books to builders
China's free trade zone plans herald quicker FX reforms
Virginia judge sentenced to 30 days for growing 41 marijuana plants
Russian researchers expose U.S. hard drive firmware spying program
Kentucky sheriff says federal gun laws won't apply in his county
Malawi man charged with ‘breaching the peace’ for calling president ‘stupid’
Startup Seeks To Replace College Debt With Tech Apprenticeships
China bans major shareholders from selling for next six months
Imminent Iran nuclear threat? A timeline of warnings since 1979.
Saudi Arabia may go broke before the US oil industry buckles
Female inmates sterilized in California prisons without approval
New Obamacare effect: working spouses taken off UPS health plans
Indiscriminate surveillance fosters distrust, conformity and mediocrity: research
Top U.S. railroad official resigns after 'consulting' income surfaces
Tesla's Elon Musk Is No Dummy