
“‘People who hold controversial views – whether it’s about gun ownership policies, drug legalization, or immigration – often must express views as a group in order to act and advocate effectively,’ said Cohn. ‘But fear of individual exposure when participating in political debates over high-stakes issues can dissuade people from taking part. That’s why the Supreme Court ruled in 1958 that membership lists of groups have strong First Amendment protection. Telephone records, especially complete records collected over many years, are even more invasive than membership lists, since they show casual or repeated inquiries as well as full membership.'”
Related posts:
QE Exit to Rattle U.S. Bond Markets, Warns OECD
Scholarly book presents ‘hidden history’ of Nazi 'gun control'
Thailand Bitcoin issues - Not exactly true
Crypto Mining Giant Bitmain Valued at $12 Billion in New Funding Round
The Aden Sisters on Gold, Commodities and Near-Term Market Prospects
The Missiles That Brought Down TWA Flight 800
CoinLab: new brands will be built around Bitcoin technology
Timothy Geithner Accused Of Alerting Banks To 2007 Interest Rate Cut For 2nd Time
Outside the United States is Terrifying! (According to the Government)
The Dollar Is A Barbarous Relic: The Rise of Bitcoin
Suspect in terror sting jailed for refusing to divulge his password
Sgt. Bales sentenced to life in prison without parole for Afghan massacre
The feds pay for 60 percent of Tor’s development. Can users trust it?
How A Manhattan Jeweler Wound Up With Gold Bars Filled With Tungsten
Miss a Little … Miss a Lot