
“One of the assurances I keep hearing about the U.S. government’s spying on American citizens is that it’s only used in cases of terrorism. Terrorism is, of course, an extraordinary crime, and its horrific nature is supposed to justify permitting all sorts of excesses to prevent it. But there’s a problem with this line of reasoning: mission creep. The definitions of ‘terrorism’ and ‘weapon of mass destruction’ are broadening, and these extraordinary powers are being used, and will continue to be used, for crimes other than terrorism. Even as the definition of terrorism broadens, we have to ask how far we will extend that arbitrary line.”
Related posts:
Three Telling Stories, One Disruptive Company
When Cops Rape ... and Nothing Happens
The West's Cold War strategy: arm Islamic extremists that became al-Qaida VIDEO
Shield Law Defines Journalism So That It Leaves Out Wikileaks & Bloggers
Ben Swann Reality Check: Monsanto and Crony Capitalism
Communism Survivor To Gun-Grabbing Politicians: "You Don't Know What Freedom Is"
Firefox PDF exploit found in the wild
Minnesota Libertarian arrested for collecting ballot signatures in a park
New Orleans Police Officer Jailed for 2012 Drug War Killing
Max Keiser Interviews Cody Wilson of Defense Distributed
Mastercoin Raises $5 Million To Build a New Layer of Money on Bitcoin
Bitcoin saves Australian company TOMCAR $50,000 in bank fees
Spain Shuts Down Google, Confronts the Internet
Woman dies after genital kick from LAPD officer
Europe Continues to Circle the Drain