“The ACA could actually cause the number of our covered employees to decrease, particularly in the first year. The penalty for declining coverage will be low compared with the cost of coverage; and employees will know that if they happen to get sick, they can get insurance after that. So the economically rational decision for young people, like our crew employees, is to pay the penalty and forego the insurance. Despite what the government may believe, our employees are smart enough to figure this out. For insurers, it’s simple math: Premiums collected must exceed claims paid. If too few young healthy people enroll, insurers will raise premiums on those who do.”
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323309404578613653344566068.html
(Visited 35 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Let Him Without a Plank in His Own Eye Cast the First Stone
The All-Seeing Eye
David Galland: The New Stoics
Digital Diversification: How to Do It
Sticky Thoughts: The Market, Not The Government, Gave Us Super Glue
Bill Bonner: Too Busy to Read Ben Graham? Do This Instead…
The Selfishness of Virtue
That Which Is Incapable of Reforming Itself Disappears
What Happens When the Surf Is Down: Contemplating Stocks without QE
Americans Are on a Tight Leash
Ron Paul’s victory over Bernanke and the Federal Reserve
Does “Homeland Security” really protect you?
Peter Schiff: Soon in America, retirement will be as rare as a single income household
Canada’s ban on e-cigarettes makes no sense
Dimes on Black and Dynamite on Red