
“A divided federal appeals court ruled today that the government does not need a probable-cause warrant to access mobile-phone subscribers’ cell-site information, a decision reversing lower court decisions that said the location data was protected by the Fourth Amendment. The 2-1 decision by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is the third federal appeals court to decide the privacy issue. All the while, two federal appellate courts have now taken the government’s position that court warrants are not required for the location data. And a third federal appellate court said judges had the option to demand warrants.”
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/07/warrantless-cell-tracking/
Related posts:
Is the TSA checking domestic airline passengers for warrants?
Nevada state senator booted from legislature after threatening his wife
South African far-left party leader assures white people he won’t kill them - yet
ISIS May Have Looted $430 Million From Mosul's Central Bank
US Bank Run Imminent? FDIC Expanded Deposit Insurance Ends Dec 31st
How to make a fortune out of the upcoming IPOs in Dubai and Abu Dhabi
Florida Official: “Abandon Jesus if You Want to Feed the Poor.”
Bitcoin: a clear choice for Seattle window cleaner
US War Crimes Bring Huge War Profits
First Pot, Now Hemp: Directed History of Cannabis Legalization Evolves
No, Trump, More Executions Won't Win the Drug War
As Long As You Don't Eat, Price Inflation Is Under Control
U.S., BIS refuse to answer questions about gold market interventions
Washington, D.C.'s First Medical Marijuana Dispensary Opens Blocks From Capitol
Senators Authorizing Syria Strike Got More Cash From Military-Industrial Complex