“Describing these factors as a threat to ‘officer safety,’ the agents demanded access to the home to conduct a ‘protective sweep,’ during which ammunition and drugs were found. A district court denied Mongold’s motion to suppress the evidence. The US. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the district court and suppressed the evidence, noting that the ATF agents ‘could most easily have protected the officers’ safety by leaving [the] home, not by entering it.’ The Tenth Circuit quite sensibly slapped down this cynical argument for a warrantless search, but it was careful to specify that its sensible ruling is not to be used as a precedent.”
http://prolibertate.us/index.php/inventing-pretexts-to-ignore-the?blog=7
Related posts:
Independent journalist Ben Swann now accepts Bitcoin for episode funding
Obama says NSA snooping prevents terrorist attacks
The first Bitcoin based bank in Cyprus is coming!
When ETF Paper Beats Gold Rock
Glenn Greenwald: Are all telephone calls recorded and accessible to the US government?
House Committee Expresses "No Confidence" in DEA Administrator
Jury Nullification Panel @ PorcFest 2013
Easy permanent residence with Panama Friendly Nations visa
If Nook goes bust, will your e-books survive?
The Expendables: The Temps Who Power Corporate Giants
The Bitcoin Gambling Diaspora
California Democratic Party tells Obama to halt medical marijuana raids
SEC Bars Egan-Jones From Rating The US And Other Governments For 18 Months
How CBP Illegally Tried to Unmask a Rogue Twitter Account
Jacob Hornberger: Rand Paul Is Wrong. Leave Iraq Alone!