“Describing these factors as a threat to ‘officer safety,’ the agents demanded access to the home to conduct a ‘protective sweep,’ during which ammunition and drugs were found. A district court denied Mongold’s motion to suppress the evidence. The US. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the district court and suppressed the evidence, noting that the ATF agents ‘could most easily have protected the officers’ safety by leaving [the] home, not by entering it.’ The Tenth Circuit quite sensibly slapped down this cynical argument for a warrantless search, but it was careful to specify that its sensible ruling is not to be used as a precedent.”
http://prolibertate.us/index.php/inventing-pretexts-to-ignore-the?blog=7
(Visited 40 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Bank of Canada Holds Swiss, Dutch, Swedish Gold
Liberals embrace gun ownership now that Trump is President
In Monaco, Between The Real Economy And A Tax Haven Black List
Random Drug Testing for All? Chilling Proposal Could Eradicate Privacy
Sioux tribes take to the Internet to buy back sacred land
4 Facts Every GLD Investor Must Know
Unlicensed Contractors 'Preying on Homeowners', Says Media
Intelligence chief defends Internet spying program
Kucinich defends tea party groups against IRS on ‘Fox News Sunday’
eBay UK to Allow Sale of Virtual Currency from 10th February
NYC Comptroller: Legalize and Tax Marijuana
How China Spawned a Bitcoin Industry in Three Months (and Why it Might be Doomed)
Jury Nullification Panel @ PorcFest 2013
Should Detroit’s Bankruptcy Be an Early-Warning Sign for Washington?
Behind the Scenes With The Trans-National Elite