
“Some residents are complaining that the signs are offensive, and they worry about the message being sent to their kids. Town officials, for their part, say the signs have to go—not because of their content, but because Mr. Sullivan did not get the proper permits needed to put up the signs in the first place. But Sullivan said through his lawyer that his billboards are protected by the First Amendment, and that he will not take them down. His lawyer, in a letter to the town, rebuffed their demand and said that the signs were political speech and therefore should be allowed to stand.”
Related posts:
Extensive Syrian Timeline Exposes Buildup to False Flag
DOJ Suspends $1.2 Billion Asset Forfeiture 'Equitable Sharing' Program
NSA ditching 90 percent of its system administrators to avoid leaks
Cannabis For Infant's Brain Tumor, Doctor Calls Child "A Miracle Baby"
Gallup Poll: Americans Trust Cops & Military Above Nearly Everything Else
Another Major Police Lie About the Boston Bomber Search
Schools Have Created a Generation of Permit Pattys and BBQ Beckys
Jeffrey Tucker: Bitcoin and E-commerce
Facebook and Google confirmed as victims of $100M phishing scam
Rand Paul opposes U.S. attack that could ‘kill Christians in Syria’
Small business Obamacare online enrollment delayed a year
Cop at Suspicionless Checkpoint Starts Barking Orders, But Then Flees from Camera
How the CIA Maneuvered to Get Secret Information From a Swiss Banker
New exploit leaves most Macs vulnerable to permanent backdooring
California Town Hired Private Law Firm to Sue Citizens, Conceal Massive Costs