
“Some residents are complaining that the signs are offensive, and they worry about the message being sent to their kids. Town officials, for their part, say the signs have to go—not because of their content, but because Mr. Sullivan did not get the proper permits needed to put up the signs in the first place. But Sullivan said through his lawyer that his billboards are protected by the First Amendment, and that he will not take them down. His lawyer, in a letter to the town, rebuffed their demand and said that the signs were political speech and therefore should be allowed to stand.”
Related posts:
Facebook-police partnership could make planning protests impossible
Idaho Seizes Medical Marijuana Activists' Kids
Maryland Senate Votes To Cover Up Speed Camera Errors
Jim Rogers on The Take Away Show - 08 Aug 2012
China Is Ending Its "One-Child Policy" - Here Are The Implications
Retired Couple Turn Into World Traveling Nomads
Is America now the largest and most secret tax haven?
Who Really Whacked Tony Soprano
Beijing Subway, Line 13, morning rush hour - just a little crowded
Double Tap Drones: What Has Happened to the United States?
'Fake' Reform: Little to Celebrate as USA Freedom Act Passes House
National I.D. By Any Other Name Still Stinks
Visa to Deploy Blockchain Research Team in Bangalore, India
Civil Libertarians Appalled by Tsarnaev Manhunt, Boston Residents Thrilled
The Latest Pot Myth, Smacked Down By Science