“Some residents are complaining that the signs are offensive, and they worry about the message being sent to their kids. Town officials, for their part, say the signs have to go—not because of their content, but because Mr. Sullivan did not get the proper permits needed to put up the signs in the first place. But Sullivan said through his lawyer that his billboards are protected by the First Amendment, and that he will not take them down. His lawyer, in a letter to the town, rebuffed their demand and said that the signs were political speech and therefore should be allowed to stand.”
(Visited 176 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Russians, Americans Take Part in Joint Air Force Counter-Terror Drill
New Jersey, already facing income tax flight, raises income tax again
Bitcoin and Intrinsic Value: a Layman’s Response to Alan Greenspan
Coinbase's Fred Ehrsam says you're thinking about Bitcoin all wrong
Missouri man arrested at hospital for refusing to leave gay partner
The biggest scams in Bitcoin history
Massive surge in Litecoin mining leads to graphics card shortage
Rootkit uses Thunderbolt accessories to infect Mac firmware
Legal Marijuana No Simple Matter for Colorado Retailers
Ron Paul Segment on RT's Prime Interest
Disarm the People, Unleash the Drones: The Feinstein Agenda
Japanese police ask ISPs to block Tor
19 Crazy Things That School Children Are Being Arrested For In America
Federal Appeals Court Busts Police For Contempt Of Cop Arrest
Inside X, the Moonshot Factory Racing to Build the Next Google