“The Constitution’s failure to protect free speech at a seemingly basic level points to a major defect in its design. While it may be praiseworthy in forcefully demanding that the government it authorizes respect the rights of its citizens, it has not provided the real structural support to ensure that those demands are met. Anyone seriously interested in protecting free speech must push for a very radical ‘constitutional amendment.’ We should work not just to change the words of the document we call ‘the Constitution,’ but instead amend our legal system by completely changing the way it’s constituted.”
Related posts:
Ben Affleck Defends TSA 'Dick Grabbing'
The End of Medical Freedom in America - A Doctor's Lament
State Dept. whistleblower’s lawyers targeted by ‘Watergate-style’ break-ins
Feds reveal the search warrant used to seize Mt. Gox account
Free Staters Win 'At Least' 15 Seats in NH State House
Another Passport Program to Avoid
Netherlands Bar Accepts Bitcoins For Beer With New POS System
More Cops in Schools Is the Wrong Answer to Mass Shootings
4 Things to Buy Before Congress Passes the Sales-Tax Law
Jim Rogers on The Take Away Show - 08 Aug 2012
Wall Street's Fair Value of Bitcoin - Inside Bitcoins NYC 2014
Bitcoin Still A Bit Player For Hedge Funds
Magic Mushrooms Fight Authoritarianism
Did you know police have their own Bill of Rights?
Man refuses to produce his papers at a Police License Checkpoint; threatened with warrant at home
