“Words like ‘interference’ or ‘obstruction’ seem to be thrown around quite frequently when law enforcement officers decide they’d rather not be filmed while on duty. How the passive act of filming can interfere with investigations or obstruct officials is left to the imagination. Fortunately (I guess…), law enforcement officials have very vivid imaginations. This allows them to arrest, detain, hassle or confiscate devices as needed, in order preserve the peace by chilling speech. The latest definition of ‘interference’ stretches the limits of credulity — to nearly 100 feet.”
Related posts:
St. Louis Police Attorney Denies Existence of His Own Drug Task Force
Eric Margolis: Trump's Failed Coup In Iran
The Secret Fed Paper That Advocated a "Carry Tax" on All Physical Cash
Alabama ends policy giving inmate food funds directly to sheriffs
Man who beat NSA in T-shirt parody case wins against Clinton group
New product shuts car engines off with a radio pulse
Oregon marijuana prices plummet due to massive oversupply
Uruguay Marijuana Legalization Bill Allows Home Grows and Sales
Van Jones rips Obama’s ‘ridiculous’ denial of domestic spying operations
A Wider World of War: U.S. Special Forces Deployed to 149 Countries in 2017
Here Comes The Federal Vaccination Registry System
DOJ ‘Elevated Its Charges’ Against Aaron Swartz Because Of Internet Community
UK May Approve Bill Allowing Spying on Individuals via Their Kids Toys
"FEMA Won't Let Us Rebuild Our Home"
Guy Builds Bomb Using Only Items Bought After Airport Security