“Words like ‘interference’ or ‘obstruction’ seem to be thrown around quite frequently when law enforcement officers decide they’d rather not be filmed while on duty. How the passive act of filming can interfere with investigations or obstruct officials is left to the imagination. Fortunately (I guess…), law enforcement officials have very vivid imaginations. This allows them to arrest, detain, hassle or confiscate devices as needed, in order preserve the peace by chilling speech. The latest definition of ‘interference’ stretches the limits of credulity — to nearly 100 feet.”
(Visited 62 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Hunger for bitcoin grows in Scandinavia as regulatory approach evolves
7 reasons why Bitcoin is bigger than ever
Pentagon Explains Why It Was Collecting Biomarkers of Russian People
One family’s TWO YEAR nightmare of having their child taken by the state
Alan Grayson on Syria strike: Military-industrial complex wants it, Americans don’t
Guerrilla surveillance camera destruction hits the U.S.
Obama Berlin Speeches: 2008 vs 2013
India mulling further efforts to curb gold imports
Clarification of William Kaye Regarding German / US gold in Hong Kong refineries
Magic Mushrooms Fight Authoritarianism
Cannabis Set to Cause a World of Pain for Big Pharma
NY Rep. Israel targets 3-D printed gun magazines
A 27-year old is offering LSD microdosing tutorials over Skype
Mother, daughter sentenced for Internet scam targeting U.S. military supporters
Russia warns of nuclear disaster if Syria is hit