
“For example, under a law recently approved by the parliament of the United Kingdom (the first country to sign an IGA), HM Revenue & Customs commits explicitly to impose the American FATCA law on British institutions. The costs of regulatory implementation by HMRC would fall on British taxpayers. In turn, UK financial institutions (and their customers) would bear hundreds of millions of pounds in costs for collecting the information for transfer to the IRS. The direct revenue benefit to the Exchequer? Zero. What is the U.S. obligated to provide in return? Nothing, as it happens. The IGAs have no clear status in American law.”
http://www.neurope.eu/article/fatca-will-europe-pay-price-one-sided-us-financial-information-demands
Related posts:
Neutrality Toward Syria Is a Non-Aggressive Policy, But Obama Wants Assad Out
Beware the man on the white horse…
Jacob Hornberger: How U.S. Sanctions Work Their Evil
Gold: Fear vs. Greed – and Taxes [Bullish]
Retirement Myth Reveals the Possibility of Great Socioeconomic Change
How, Exactly, Does A Travel Ban Keep Us Safe?
Detlev Schlichter: Stimulus, to infinity and beyond
Almost Every Passenger on Indian Flight Found Carrying 1kg of Gold
Bill Bonner: In Praise of Mr. Putin
Snowden Is Not the Story
Bill Bonner: Is it time to choose sides in Egypt?
Judge Napolitano: The NSA Scandal Violates the Lessons of Our History and Our Constitution
Pepe Escobar: The illusory state of the Empire
David Galland: What the Hell Is Wrong with Obama?
3 Myths About Secession