“All of this provides a real-world example of the possibility of adjudicating disputes in a private and contractual manner. It does not take a huge leap of faith to conclude that a decentralized arbitration system could be extended to smaller and smaller segments of the population, ultimately leading to a private security environment. If it can be done between states, why not between individuals (or private insurance / security companies) in a world without states as we currently use the term? Why limit the possibilities by geographical boundaries – some form of panarchy, if you will?”
http://bionicmosquito.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-century-of-arbitration-and-peace.html
Related posts:
David Galland: The Other Side of the Wall
And the Actual Customers….
The Land of the Blind: The Illusion of Freedom in America
The Logic of the Police State
Hold US Policymakers to Their Abysmal Record on Foreign Meddling
How to End the Wars - It really is easy and it's been done before
How to Use Sex Like a Russian Spy
The Myth of Journalistic Objectivity
Anthony Gregory: The Habeas Corpus Myth
Syria and the Perpetual War Economy
When You Need To Disappear
The Whistleblower’s Guide to the Orwellian Galaxy: How to Leak to the Press
The Road to the Permanent Warfare State, Part 12 - Gregory Bresiger
Stop-and-Frisk: How Government Creates Problems, Then Makes Them Worse
CFR Reports on Deadly Viruses That Become the Property of Sovereign Nations