“All of this provides a real-world example of the possibility of adjudicating disputes in a private and contractual manner. It does not take a huge leap of faith to conclude that a decentralized arbitration system could be extended to smaller and smaller segments of the population, ultimately leading to a private security environment. If it can be done between states, why not between individuals (or private insurance / security companies) in a world without states as we currently use the term? Why limit the possibilities by geographical boundaries – some form of panarchy, if you will?”
http://bionicmosquito.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-century-of-arbitration-and-peace.html
Related posts:
The JFK Assassination Marked the End of the American Republic
The Management-free Organization
I never knew how screwed up global banking was until I started my own bank
You Might Not Read This Because It Says the World Is Getting Better
Robert Ringer: A Tale of Two Winners
Bill Bonner: Middle Class? What Middle Class?
The Reason Police Brutality Is Rising
In France's Welfare State Status Quo, Are We Seeing America's Future?
Stefan Molyneux: The Truth About How The US Will Save Syria
Ten Ways to Reduce Terrorism - Can We Admit The War On Terror Has Failed?
The Most Awesomest War Ever! [2003]
Deciding on Living in Medellin, Colombia: The Good & Bad
Ron Paul: The Homeschooling Revolution
What's Up with Inflation?
Murray Rothbard: Fighting for Oil? [1990]