“All of this provides a real-world example of the possibility of adjudicating disputes in a private and contractual manner. It does not take a huge leap of faith to conclude that a decentralized arbitration system could be extended to smaller and smaller segments of the population, ultimately leading to a private security environment. If it can be done between states, why not between individuals (or private insurance / security companies) in a world without states as we currently use the term? Why limit the possibilities by geographical boundaries – some form of panarchy, if you will?”
http://bionicmosquito.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-century-of-arbitration-and-peace.html
Related posts:
How the Taxman Cleared the Dance Floor
Bill Bonner: Price does not tell you all you need to know
Doug Casey Refutes Common Hesitations to Internationalize
Deciding on Living in Medellin, Colombia: The Good & Bad
The Politics of Fear in America: A Nation at War with Itself
The Source of Systemic Crisis: Risk and Moral Hazard
State-Wrecked: The Corruption of Capitalism in America - David Stockman
America's best educated kids don't go to school
Jeffrey Tucker: How Medical Innovation Redefines Our World
An Expatriate's View of Vietnam
Jeffrey Tucker: Is Bitcoin Real or Not?
Attempts To Eliminate Cash Are More Than A Privacy Disaster
Why NSA Snooping Is Bigger Deal in Germany
Have We Reached Peak Government?
Anthony Gregory: The Right & the Drug War