“When Diane Sawyer asked Bush why he had claimed with such certainty that there were so many weapons in Iraq, he replied: ‘What’s the difference? The possibility that [Saddam] could acquire weapons, If he were to acquire weapons, he would be the danger.’ What’s the difference? In a society based on the rule of law, the difference would be a criminal prosecution. MSNBC and Hubris steer us away from any ideas of accountability. And no connection is drawn to current war lies about Iran or other nations. But the production of programs like this one that prolong Americans’ awareness of the lies that destroyed Iraq are the best hope Iran has right now.”
http://warisacrime.org/content/hubris-isnt-half-it
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
On Poisoned Ground: East Chicago’s legacy of lead pollution
The Economic Philosopher's Outcast: Mises
The Secret History of G.I. Joe
John Hussman: All Their Eggs in Janet's Basket
Satoshi Nakamoto: Natural Elite to the Rescue
When the FDA Declared War on a Texas AIDS Patient
Doug Casey on the Fourth Estate
David Stockman: The End of U.S. Imperium—Finally!
What’s the Better Role Model, France or Switzerland?
Beyond the Debt-Ceiling Debate
Jacob G. Hornberger: The Evil of the National-Security State, Part 3
BEARCAT Bread And Circuses, Or Why I Ripped Up My Ticket
Bill Bonner: Fed's QE has not created one single extra job
Hong Kong Wrong [2006]
John Hussman: Psychological Whiplash