“Scientists who study human behaviour are more likely than average to report exaggerated or eye-catching results if they are based in the United States, according to an analysis of more than 1,000 research papers in psychiatry and genetics. This bias could be due to the research culture in the US, authors of the analysis said, which tends to preferentially reward scientists for the novelty and immediate impact of a piece of work over the quality or its long-term contribution to the field. One of the authors said that there was intense competition in the US for research funds and, subsequently, pressure to report novel findings in prestigious, high-impact scientific journals.”
Related posts:
Gold Scrap Supply to Drop Up to 25% as Lower Prices Deter Sales
Amazon’s next move: From books to builders
Army plans switch to ‘green’ bullets containing copper
How close are we to getting superpowers?
Suspension over gun-shaped toaster pastry is now permanent mark on kid’s record
Cannes Film Festival rocked as $1 million worth of red carpet ‘loaner’ jewels are stolen
Tree Theft on the Rise in Germany as Heating Costs Increase
Jay Leno’s at the Top of his Game, so Why Is NBC Replacing Him?
U.S. ‘very disappointed’ by Russian ban on U.S. meat
Government considers using search engines as source of cheap info on citizens' lives
America has history when it comes to forcing down planes in defiance of international law
Patient has 75 per cent of his skull replaced by 3D-printed implant
Texas teacher facing prison after sex with 5 students
Marc Faber on ET NOW, 03 July 2013
Japanese university to retract Novartis study based on fabricated data