
“A small hole in a tail light does not justify a traffic stop, the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled last week. A three-judge panel said the evidence against Brad Kroft should have been suppressed because police should not have stopped his Jeep Commander on April 22, 2012. At around 1:30am, Kroft had been driving with his wife Heidi on 96th Street near Hague Road in Indianapolis. There was a crack in his passenger-side tail light that created a dime-size hole in the otherwise fully functional stop light. A passing police officer saw it and decided he could issue a ticket.”
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/41/4177.asp
Related posts:
Afghanistan’s first recorded bitcoin transaction?
Fantasy Land Financial Analysis for Investors
The Next Domino: Slovenia Government Bond Yields Spike
Original owner of Toronto ex-mayor’s alleged ‘crack’ video may have been killed
Student Expelled After Investigation By Cop Who Was Dating His Girlfriend
Silver found to be key weapon in fight against antibiotics resistance
Reefer Madness… by Executive Order
Texas Generally Exempts Bitcoin From Money Transmission Laws
Wash. state bill allows police to search students without parental consent
Belgium’s finance minister has no objection to bitcoin
Lew Rockwell explains how the Federal Reserve Enables War, Empire, and Destroys the Middle Class
Why Is the U.S. Funding International Drug Rehabs Known for Torture and Abuse?
When We Will Celebrate the End of QE, and Why
West-Backed Christian Holocaust in Syria
Should Defendants With Frozen Assets Have Right To Hire Lawyers?