“Amidst the developing momentum for the U.S. to enter another war that will strengthen al-Qaeda and its allies — like the one Obama fought in Libya and the anti-democratic one in Egypt he authorized this month — perhaps it is worth reviewing three salient and crystal clear facts. –1st : The United States has no genuine national-security interests in Syria. –2nd: Unless America is attacked first, no U.S. president has the constitutional authority to take America to war without a formal declaration of war by Congress. –3rd : Today’s status quo in Syria benefits U.S. national-security interests without Washington having to take any action at all.”
http://non-intervention.com/1130/use-the-constitution-to-prevent-war-with-syria/
Related posts:
Michael Scheuer: In Mali, the interventionist establishment already is lying about “unintended conse...
EU Financial Tax Portends Loss of Market Leadership
Obama Administration Denies AP Requests For Syria Evidence
Google's 'principles' on AI weapons, mass surveillence, and signing out
3D printed guns are going to create big legal precedents
Bravo Britain
Sorry, Comrade; You Didn’t Discover Secret To Make Communism Work
Question the 'National-Defense' Exception to Free Trade
Honduras Startup City Redux: from RED to ZEDE to … Freedom?
Steve Gibson: The Lesson of Lavabit
Glenn Greenwald: Correspondence and collusion between the New York Times and the CIA
Should insider trading be legal? Insiders say yes
Emergency Powers Spell Corrosion of Liberty and Safety
Jim Rogers: At What Price You Should Start Buying Gold
Can We Ever Trust Black Market Websites Again?