
“Fiscal competition makes it difficult for governments to expand the welfare state to dangerous levels. In other words, it is a way of protecting governments from the worst impulses of their politicians. I can’t resist sharing one additional bit of information from the Feld-Schnellenbach paper. They compare redistribution in several nations. As you can see in the table reproduced below, the United States and Switzerland benefit from having the lowest levels of overall redistribution. It’s no coincidence that the U.S. and Switzerland are also the two nations with the most decentralization.”
Related posts:
Wrongfully Imprisoned for 31 Years, and This is Considered Justice?
Should Advocates of Small Government Escape to Canada?
Neutrality Toward Syria Is a Non-Aggressive Policy, But Obama Wants Assad Out
Obama (Scut Farkus), Europe (Grover Dill), and Snowden (Ralphie)
The case of Brandon Raub: Can the government detain you over Facebook posts?
Patrick Buchanan: America Says ‘No!’ to a Beltway War
Ron Paul: The Real Meaning of President Obama’s National Security Speeches
Anthony Gregory: Do We Want a ‘Stop-and-Frisk’ Society?
Investors Say: “Mises Was Right!”
Bill Bonner: An Important Lesson from Tony Soprano
The Deeper Meanings of Cyprus
Jim Rogers on Politics, Money Metals and How to Deal With an Endless Downturn
Whole Foods Co-CEO: Unintended Consequences in Health-Care Law
On The Fed's (Tentative) End to Bond Purchases in October
Jacob Hornberger: Massacres, Here and Abroad