“You may remember a rather wonderful court case from 2012 that pitted copyright lawyers against patent lawyers over the issue of whether submitting journal articles as part of the patenting process was fair use. Well, we now have the judge’s decision. US Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Keyes sided with the patent lawyers, ruling that the reason they made unlicensed copies of the articles was to comply with the law for submitting applications to the patent office — and not to compete within the market for scientific journals. The USPTO had already thrown its weight behind the idea that copies of scientific articles submitted as part of the patent application were indeed fair use.”
Related posts:
40% of U.S. on Benefits; More Receive Benefits Than Full-Time-Employed
Another woman arrested for defending herself against the TSA
Moscow exchange launches first precious metals trading
Samsung workers are given 32 seconds to assemble phones
Corvette's brakes wirelessly hacked through an insurance dongle
Autonomous Mowing: The Death of Lawn Maintenance Employment
Ron Paul Supporters Travel From Germany And Switzerland To Attend Paul Fest
First Amendment lawyer: ‘It is a terrible time to be a journalist’
Man Who Saved 669 Kids From Nazis Turns 105
Feds vs. Raisins: Small Farmers Stand Up to the USDA
New exchange leaves Bitcoin regulation up to Wall Street bankers
Prison Phone Call Industry Will Fight New FCC Rules Lowering Inmate Rates
West-Backed Christian Holocaust in Syria
Former California cop arrested for raping prostitutes while in uniform
Cyber thieves blamed for botnet Bitcoin heist: researchers