“You may remember a rather wonderful court case from 2012 that pitted copyright lawyers against patent lawyers over the issue of whether submitting journal articles as part of the patenting process was fair use. Well, we now have the judge’s decision. US Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Keyes sided with the patent lawyers, ruling that the reason they made unlicensed copies of the articles was to comply with the law for submitting applications to the patent office — and not to compete within the market for scientific journals. The USPTO had already thrown its weight behind the idea that copies of scientific articles submitted as part of the patent application were indeed fair use.”
Related posts:
Catalan politicians ask for EU help against Spanish army
US Files Criminal Charges Against SAC For the Non-Crime Of Insider Trading
Maryland Gov. O’Malley to sign marijuana decriminalization bill
With Three Weeks to Go, Nobody Knows What ObamaCare Will Cost.
Former Internet Provider Recounts How He Was Gagged By FBI For 6 Years
Rescuing “Hitler”: Obama’s Bailout of Assad
Health Insurance Under Obamacare: "The More You Make The More You'll Pay"
How to become a drone target
Dozens killed in US-led drone strike in southern Somalia
FBI Releases Information on Michael Hastings
Papers Please: TSA-Style Checkpoints at UK Bus & Train Stations
Chase Bank Limits Cash Withdrawals, Bans International Wire Transfers
Goldman Predicts More Gold Manipulation?
Why the BBC Fails to Care
UN Claims Uruguay Not Allowed to End Marijuana Prohibition