“An argument is being made that the credibility of the U.S. government is at stake, and that it needs to follow through on the red line threats issued by the government. But if the U.S. has been so foolish as to make threats that might diminish its credibility and harm its capacity for self-defense, it does not follow that it has now gained the privilege or right of making good on its threats. One’s mistakes or threats do not generate rights and privileges. Obama began by making the preceding credibility argument about the U.S. and his own red line threats. He has since extended that invalid argument to the ‘international community’.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/does-the-u-s-government-have-a-right-to-bomb-syria/
Related posts:
Tor and the Silk Road takedown
The Shearing of the Sheeple
While America Feuds, the Police State Shifts Into High Gear
Don't Photoshop Obama
Is It Too Late for an Obama-Romney Ticket?
The Oil Patch Will Rise Again
Anthony Wile: The Danger Beyond Employment Numbers
Nobel Selects EU ... World Snorts
Why Are Bond Yields Falling as Stocks Rally?
Point-By-Point Rebuttal of U.S. Case for War In Syria
Obama and Israel Stoke a Sectarian Shia-Sunni War
Bill Bonner: Paddywhacking
Where Will QE3 Take Us?
State Regulation of Virtual Currencies Will Complicate Compliance
An Ally Out of Control
