“An argument is being made that the credibility of the U.S. government is at stake, and that it needs to follow through on the red line threats issued by the government. But if the U.S. has been so foolish as to make threats that might diminish its credibility and harm its capacity for self-defense, it does not follow that it has now gained the privilege or right of making good on its threats. One’s mistakes or threats do not generate rights and privileges. Obama began by making the preceding credibility argument about the U.S. and his own red line threats. He has since extended that invalid argument to the ‘international community’.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/does-the-u-s-government-have-a-right-to-bomb-syria/
Related posts:
Constitution prohibits Trump's pre-emptive strike against N. Korea
"Rapid Progress": Controlling the Imperial Military With Drugs
How “Your” Government Works
Senkaku: The Islands That Launched a Thousand Ships
The Tenuous Nature of Borderless Money
Jacob Hornberger: The Banality of Evil in the War on Drugs
Obama, the US Liar-in-Chief
Paul Ryan's corporatist past gives way to populist talk
Two Cheers for the Coming Collapse of the U.S. Economy!
Public Justice Under Attack?
Media Infantilism, Ours And Theirs
Paul Craig Roberts: Another Western War Crime In The Making
The UK Recovery that Isn't ... the Market Recovery that Is
Daylight robbery in Cyprus will come to haunt EMU
John Whitehead: The Anatomy of a National Nervous Breakdown