“An argument is being made that the credibility of the U.S. government is at stake, and that it needs to follow through on the red line threats issued by the government. But if the U.S. has been so foolish as to make threats that might diminish its credibility and harm its capacity for self-defense, it does not follow that it has now gained the privilege or right of making good on its threats. One’s mistakes or threats do not generate rights and privileges. Obama began by making the preceding credibility argument about the U.S. and his own red line threats. He has since extended that invalid argument to the ‘international community’.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lrc-blog/does-the-u-s-government-have-a-right-to-bomb-syria/
Related posts:
More Dark Side From The Empire
Lacking More Important Business, Trump Renews War On Pot Smokers
How Will You Deal With $10 a Gallon Gas?
Bill Bonner: Should Larry Summers replace Ben Bernanke?
The Hidden Cost of Oil
Confiscation by the Installment Plan
Bob Higgs: What the State Fears Most—Revelations of the Truth about the State
The French Version of Atlas Shrugged
Fury at the American Raj
Sheldon Richman: No 'Compensation' to Israel for Iran Deal
Jacob Hornberger: Who's Really Getting Punished?
Senator Wyden Warns Against the Surveillance State
Naomi Wolf on the Crackdown on Dissent in America
Krugman thinks low interest rates are behind the boom in paper currency. Not so fast!
How Responsible Is Obama for the Oklahoma Killing?
