“The Administration is considering intervening in the Syrian civil war. We oppose this. There’s no vital national security involved. We are not the world’s policeman, nor its judge and jury. Our own needs in America are great, and they come first. The death of civilians is always regrettable, and civil war is regrettable, but no Americans have been attacked, and no American allies have been attacked. The British Parliament understandably has voted not to join in any attack. Notably, defense contractor Raytheon’s stock is up 20% in the last 60 days. It seems that nobody wants US intervention in Syria except the military-industrial complex. I oppose US military intervention in Syria. Join me.”
Related posts:
NYPD officers testify stop-and-frisk program motivated by quotas and race
NYPD collaborated with CIA on surveillance after 9/11
Texas Man Transporting His Unloaded Firearms Through NJ Now Doing 3-5 Years in Prison
Tom Woods: The Attractiveness of Austrian Economics
Fordlandia: Henry Ford's Amazon Dystopia
Libertarianism and The Congressional Vote on Attacking Syria
The Sunday Times interview with Syria's President Bashar al-Assad
German jailed for Julius Bär bank data theft
Pepe Escobar: Al-Qaeda to the rescue
Unemployment Rate for Workers With a Bachelors Degree or Higher
Pentagon Unilaterally Grants Itself Authority Over ‘Civil Disturbances’
Next to Use 3-D Printing: Your Surgeon
Irish government promises income tax cuts in next budget
Andreessen: Bitcoin is like the early Internet
Will Grigg: Sex Predators in Uniform
