“A recent case in which a man was charged in court with possession of cannabis – even though the police found no cannabis on his person – turns out to be far more commonplace than one would think. According to criminal lawyer Dr Joe Giglio, this case was no by means a one-off incident. In fact he claims that as many as half the cases pressed by the police for possession of illicit substances will not be based on the discovery of any drugs in the possession of the accused, adding that the police have a standard formula for how to extract such confessions from unwitting suspects.”
Related posts:
Italian showdown with Germany as Enrico Letta rejects 'death by austerity'
Millennials Mired in Wealth Gap as Older Americans Recoup Wealth
Kerry: U.S. has firm evidence sarin gas was used in Syria attack
In Venezuela, Almost-Free Gas Comes at a High Cost
Senate approves Obama request to arm, train Syrian rebels
France bombs Isis depot in Iraq
Apple Pay won't bite into bitcoin: Winklevoss
Israeli PM ordered strike on Iran in 2010
San Diego cop kills service dog after knocking on wrong door
Banknote printer De La Rue to cut jobs in shift to electronic payments
Chinese university fires outspoken economist amid crackdown on dissent
Syria opposition ‘disappointed’ but thinks Congress will OK strike
Argentina: BMWs Gaining Bitcoin-Like Appeal as Inflation Hedge
The Top 10 Companies With The Best Business Outlook According To Employees
Pressure on China central bank for 15% yuan depreciation: sources