“To be clear, Secretary Kerry and President Obama are not proposing a war. Yes, they will use cruise missiles to slaughter Syrians, and if they don’t like the Syrian government’s response they may even send ground troops. War profiteers like Raytheon will certainly profit. But the Secretary of State will insist it’s not a war. So, why the Orwellian ‘War is Peace’ attitude here? Partially because Kerry recognizes this war is not popular with the American public. Polls show substantial public opposition. When most Americans oppose war, the best solution apparently is to change the name to something else.”
Related posts:
Why Are Bond Yields Falling as Stocks Rally?
Westerners Kidnapped in North Africa — but Is France the Real Target?
The Greatest Threat to Our Freedoms Is the Government
Your Most Important Gold and Silver Questions — Answered
When It Comes To Healthcare, Paul Krugman Is Wrong 100% Of The Time
Should insider trading be legal? Insiders say yes
Detlev Schlichter: ECB policy & the gold battle between Chinese housewives and Wall Street
Ron Paul on Obama's Syria WMD Claim
Ron Paul: Why Is Washington Backing Saudi Starvation Policy In Yemen?
For Pakistanis It’s A Boston Marathon Bombing Nearly Everyday
Massive jump in people who renounced US citizenship last quarter
There is no terrorist threat: The feds want you to think there is
Peter Schiff: Detroit Broke City
Bill Bonner: What does real estate want to do?
Bill Bonner: A Secret Only a Tiny Number of Investors Understand