“To be clear, Secretary Kerry and President Obama are not proposing a war. Yes, they will use cruise missiles to slaughter Syrians, and if they don’t like the Syrian government’s response they may even send ground troops. War profiteers like Raytheon will certainly profit. But the Secretary of State will insist it’s not a war. So, why the Orwellian ‘War is Peace’ attitude here? Partially because Kerry recognizes this war is not popular with the American public. Polls show substantial public opposition. When most Americans oppose war, the best solution apparently is to change the name to something else.”
Related posts:
No Military Coups for America? What About November 1963?
German Government Takes Off Mask, Emerges As Fascist Dictatorship
The Corrupting Influence of Political Intelligence
U.S., Europe Still Funding Egypt Military Oppression With Billions
Four More Years of Uncertainty
The Fed Has Failed, Failed, Failed
The Military-Industrial Complex, Neocons and General Patraeus
As the market panic demonstrates, central banks are stuck on a treadmill of money printing
Jeffrey Tucker: The War Is On You
China has much at risk but no reach in Middle East
Jacob Hornberger: Celebrating The Cuban Air Crash
Jacob Hornberger: Operation Jade Helm
John Hussman: Reversing the Speculative Effect of QE Overnight
Bill Bonner: Paddywhacking
Bill Bonner: Larry Summers Was a Lousy Choice Anyway
