“Events in Syria are of marginal importance to us, and on the edge of our ability to influence. Since the civil war in Syria is a major focus of the world-wide, longstanding struggle between Islam’s Sunni and Shia factions, what will happen there will be determined by Syrians and their neighbors regardless of what the US government does or does not do. The Syrian civil war’s importance to us, however, may well be that it is reminding us of how we should deal with matters of war and peace, namely: concretely, logically, un-emotionally, jealously matching the ends we seek with the means we are willing to use. American statesmen have not done that consistently for a century.”
http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=4719
Related posts:
Ignore Saudi and Israeli Goading for Muscular U.S. Mideast Policy
Detlev Schlichter: ‘Positive Money’ and the fallacy of the need for a state money producer
David Stockman: The End of U.S. Imperium—Finally!
Resistance is Dangerous; Submission is Frequently Fatal
Robert Ringer: When Not to Save Money
David Galland: How to Tell if You Live in a Police State
David Galland: The Age of Entitlement
20 Things 20-Year-Olds Don't Get
The Gig Economy Makes Karl Marx’s Dreams Come True
Why Whiskey Was Money, and Bitcoins Might Be
Rand Paul: Helping Syrian rebels a dangerous risk
Bill Bonner: Are We on the Cusp of a New Bull Market in Gold?
Secession: Armed vs. Peaceful
A Real and Lasting Peace
Jeffrey Tucker: 3 Important Lessons from a Canadian Border Crossing