
“The panic and bailouts that followed were really about protecting the bonuses and incomes of very wealthy and politically well-connected managers at banks and other heavily leveraged businesses that were eventually deemed too big to fail. What followed was a massive transfer of wealth from the taxpayers and middle-class savers, in the form of bailouts and zero interest rates on bank deposits imposed by the Fed, to the so-called One Percent. As I show in my book, none of this was necessary to save the larger economy, since the losses that would have taken place as a result of the collapse would have been largely limited to Wall Street.”
http://www.mises.org/daily/6521/David-Stockman-on-his-Book-and-the-Bailouts
Related posts:
When Zero’s Too High: Time preference versus central bankers
Ron Paul: Nixon’s Vindication
Former CIA Officer Philip Giraldi: 'Edward Snowden Is No Traitor'
Bernanke "The Only Game in Town": Really?
Jacob Hornberger: Why Kennedy Had to Be Removed
“Hurry Up and Die”: The Inescapable Outcome of Socialized Medicine
Hacking Law and Governance with Startup Cities
Wild and Free: The Libertarian Philosophy of Henry David Thoreau
Herbert Spencer: Patriotism (from Facts and Comments, 1902)
Trans Pacific Partnership Is about Control, Not Free Trade
Central banks that trade on the stock market [2013]
The Great Default: Taxpayers Cannot Grow Their Way Out of Government's Problem
Henry Magee, John Quinn, and the "Right of Resistance"
Why Oil Could Move Higher--Much Higher
Will Grigg: Why is it a “Crime” to Disarm a Uniformed Aggressor?