“‘As I was approaching him, I read ‘BAN CAMS’ on the sign he was wearing,’ Officer Campbell wrote. ‘He was holding a large stack of papers… I asked him if he had a permit to protest the red light cameras, and he said no.’ At this point, Officer Campbell asked for Schmidter’s identification. Since he was not driving, the man explained he was not carrying any. The officer then asked for his name and date of birth. Schmidter declined to do so unless the officer could show him what law he had violated. Officer Campbell said he did not have to do that. After asking one more time he grabbed Schmidter’s wrist, handcuffed him, and placed him under arrest.”
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/42/4208.asp
Related posts:
Google confirms critical Android crypto flaw used in $5,700 Bitcoin heist
France's Socialists Generate A New Class Of Tax Exiles
Once Again, Activists Must Beg the Government to Preserve the Right to Repair
Non-Traditional Retirements, or DIY Sabbaticals
Details About BitcoinWallet.com $250,000 Reported Sale
The Secret Plot to Prop Up the Municipal Bond Market
Toobin Preaches Sanctity of Gov. Secrets, Despite Himself Stealing Classified Docs
What Are Bitcoins: The How, Why and Why Not
No way out: Julian Assange marks one year inside Ecuadorian embassy in UK
At Least 46 Killed in Two Days of US Drone Strikes in Yemen
US Small Business Owners' Hiring Intent Plunges to 2008 Lows
As Silk Road 2.0 Pops Up, The Government Needs To Avoid Moral Panic
Half of U.S. millenials would give up voting rights to forgive student loans
Senators Authorizing Syria Strike Got More Cash From Military-Industrial Complex
Dronebusters: Turning Spy Drones into Barney Fife