
“ACLU attorney Michael Risher opened his argument by evoking the compelling image of a registrant who wishes to make an anonymous critical comment about his local police department on the online comment section of his local newspaper, ‘His speech will be chilled knowing that the police has his online identities down at the station.’ There are signs that restricting registrants’ access to the Internet, in particular social media, is a growing trend. North Carolina has banned registrants from social networks like Facebook and other chat rooms, and Pennsylvania is considering similar legislation. Earlier this year, a similar ban in Indiana was struck down by a court of appeals.”
Related posts:
Lead Sponsor Of Federal High Capacity Ban Was Unaware Magazines Could Be Reloaded
Bill Bonner on the Alex Jones Show (2014/08/07)
NATO: The Broken Promise Has Backfired–Ukraine
One Man's Terrorist
First Time On Record: The US Government Is 'Riskier' Than US Banks
FATCA: Probably the Worst Law Americans Don't Know About
Feinstein and Rogers Refuse to Discuss Constitutionality of Mass Surveillance
Stephen Halbrook on His New Book "Gun Control in the Third Reich"
Goldman Sachs: Bitcoin Isn’t a Currency But Tech Holds Promise
Venezuela's President Sets Up a "Ministry of Supreme Social Happiness"
7 reasons why Bitcoin is bigger than ever
Ecuadorean Tribal Leaders Fight Government, Gold-Hungry Chinese
In Stamps We Trust: Paving the Road to Prosperity with Food Stamps
No way out: Julian Assange marks one year inside Ecuadorian embassy in UK
Secret Bitcoin mining code added to e-sports software sparks outrage