“A couple years ago, we were disappointed to see a judge take the technologically wrong stance that data transmitted over WiFi is not a ‘radio communication,’ thereby making sniffing of unencrypted WiFi signals potentially a form of wiretapping. Indeed, based on that, the court eventually ruled that Google’s infamous WiFi sniffing could be a violation of wiretap laws. This is wrong on so many levels… and tragically, an appeals court has now upheld the lower court’s ruling. There are serious problems with this. Under no reasonable view is WiFi not a radio communication first of all. That’s exactly what it is.”
Related posts:
Revealed: Al-Qaeda’s 22 Tips For Dodging Drones
Wormwood and a Shocking Secret of War
The NSA Playset: Espionage tools for the rest of us
After extracting $1 billion bribe from ZTE, Commerce Dept. partially lifts ban
Mexico: The World’s New China
EU data law hits set-back in Germany
Patented insulin prices spike 10x, but black market keeps kids alive
Shakil Khan: Bitcoin can be “money over IP”, but services must get more intuitive
Hapifork 'smart fork' review: eat slower to eat better
Federal Reserve: Chinese Economic Data is Bogus
Online gambling ban won’t stop online gambling, but will stop growth
If You Used This Secure Webmail Site, the FBI Has Your Inbox
Former Internet Provider Recounts How He Was Gagged By FBI For 6 Years
61.2% Voted For Nobody
Military grade secured Computationcenter in modern Armybunker