“A couple years ago, we were disappointed to see a judge take the technologically wrong stance that data transmitted over WiFi is not a ‘radio communication,’ thereby making sniffing of unencrypted WiFi signals potentially a form of wiretapping. Indeed, based on that, the court eventually ruled that Google’s infamous WiFi sniffing could be a violation of wiretap laws. This is wrong on so many levels… and tragically, an appeals court has now upheld the lower court’s ruling. There are serious problems with this. Under no reasonable view is WiFi not a radio communication first of all. That’s exactly what it is.”
Related posts:
Nigel Farage: Major European Bank Runs Now Taking Place
China is building a DMV station powered by AI, not humans
Foreign Tax will affect thousands of Americans living abroad
His Canadian citizenship is not in doubt. Is Senator Ted Cruz a US citizen?
WSJ: White House Preparing Bernanke's Replacement
Sell a gun to someone who smokes a joint, get 20 years in jail
O’Donnell: Napalm is America’s ‘cheapest weapon of mass destruction’
Navy Uses US Citizens as Pawns in Domestic War Games
Why Crude’s at Home in Triple Digits
Peter Thiel’s Seasteading Dream Floats On
Chart Of The Day: Foreigners Are Quietly Getting Out Of Dodge
GreenBank Capital makes first Bitcoin angel investment
Pay me in gold: Romania's new term as it gets more of Rosia Montana
These Startups Are Betting Everything on Bitcoin
Russia won’t extradite Snowden to US – Kremlin