“No Establishment author comes out and says this: ‘The Federal Reserve System possesses complete federal sovereignty, yet is beyond the power of any branch of government. It is legally more independent than the CIA. This is a great thing. Democracy has its limits, and should not be defended as a universally legitimate system of government.’ This is in fact what the entire American Establishment believes, but never, ever says in public. The Establishment says ‘independent,’ not ‘anti-democratic.’ They figure that the rubes — voters — will not catch on. They assume correctly.”
http://teapartyeconomist.com/2013/09/23/washington-post-article-identified-fed-chairman-2-power/
Related posts:
County sheriff has used stingray over 300 times with no warrant
Man With 4th Amendment Written on Chest Wins Trial Over Airport Arrest
US Military and Civil Officials Set to Police in Canada
Central Bank Panics As China Suffers Its Biggest Bankruptcy Of 2018
Support the Troops with Peace and the 'Right to Try'
A (relatively easy to understand) primer on elliptic curve cryptography
MP3tunes and its founder liable for $63 million in EMI copyright suit
De Facto Hash Truce in Lebanon's Bekaa Valley
Arizona Man Winds Up Jailed, Unemployed and Homeless After Photographing Courthouse
Toughest encryption cracked by listening to your CPU with a phone
Robocoin, The Bitcoin ATM, Is Heading To Hong Kong And Taiwan
Analysis Of National Data Finds No Benefit To Red Light Cameras
Homeland Security Classifies ICE Ammo Purchase Following Controversy
"Polish" Death Camps and Censorship's Unintended Consequences
Small Utah ISP firm stands up to ‘surveillance state’ as corporations cower