
“When the government gathers intelligence in order to prevent the future occurrence of an act of domestic terror, as opposed to when it gathers evidence in order to solve a crime that has already been committed, it believes it is not subject to the constraints of the Fourth Amendment. Such an argument is Stalinesque in its sweep, has no support in history, law or Supreme Court jurisprudence, and is a subterfuge concocted to dupe the public, the media and the judiciary into overlooking, accepting and authorizing the broadest governmental assault on constitutionally protected freedoms since the Alien and Sedition Acts.”
http://www.creators.com/opinion/judge-napolitano/spying-and-lying.html
Related posts:
‘We the People’: The New Permanent Underclass in America
Larken Rose: What's So Bad About Nazis?
Paul Craig Roberts: Growing Up In America
Obamacare and the New Soviet Man
Bauman’s Little Black Book of Buffoons
Wow much Dogecoin. Very competition. So money.
Colorado’s New Cannabis Economy
FATCA: a Tool of the Electronic Surveillance State
The Industrial Revolution You Haven't Met
Race to the Bottom: Injuring the Real Economy with Paper "Wealth"
How the Nazis Used Gun Control
Sheriff Bradshaw and the Palm Beach County Psihuska
Bill Bonner: Are We on the Cusp of a New Bull Market in Gold?
Liberty Is Making the World Richer. You're Included.
US Markets Are Running On Borrowed Money, Borrowed Time