
“The government’s response (PDF), filed on September 30th, is a heavily redacted opposition arguing that when law enforcement can monitor one person’s information without a warrant, it can monitor everyone’s information, ‘regardless of the collection’s expanse.’ Notably, the government is also arguing that no one other than the company that provided the information—including the defendant in this case—has the right to challenge this disclosure in court. The United States government designated al-Shabaab—which means ‘The Youth’—a terrorist group in 2008, but the FBI’s extensive wiretapping of Moalin started about two months before that.”
Related posts:
Scientists: Plants communicate with one another through ‘nanomechanical vibrations’
How we'd cover Ferguson if it happened in another country
Bitcoin a Refuge For Argentines Tired of Government's Currency Despotism
Hapifork 'smart fork' review: eat slower to eat better
Study Rejects Cell Phone Driving Danger Claims
Sessions Asks Congress To Undo Medical Marijuana Protections
Bill Bonner: The Committee to Blow Up the World
Sydney Smith on Military Adventures and Attempting to Protect Mankind
Hillary Clinton Starts to Cash in Big Time
Sears Plans To Retrofit 2,500 "Ghostbox" Stores As Data Centers
Oklahoma Parking Lot Patriots Kicked to the Curb by the Republican National Committee
WATCH OUT BELOW: S&P 1987 Compared with S&P 2013
Man Offers Random People A Free One Ounce Gold Coin: No Takers
Hungary Now Imposes Tax On Non-Resident Citizens
Why Have Police In America Turned Into Such Ruthless Thugs?