
“The government’s response (PDF), filed on September 30th, is a heavily redacted opposition arguing that when law enforcement can monitor one person’s information without a warrant, it can monitor everyone’s information, ‘regardless of the collection’s expanse.’ Notably, the government is also arguing that no one other than the company that provided the information—including the defendant in this case—has the right to challenge this disclosure in court. The United States government designated al-Shabaab—which means ‘The Youth’—a terrorist group in 2008, but the FBI’s extensive wiretapping of Moalin started about two months before that.”
Related posts:
How Millennials will shape the future of work
Mark Thornton: Government's War on Bitcoin
Is this Sandpoint, Idaho -- or Soviet Russia?
Bitcoins: Too Big to Derail?
Thought The Euro Crisis Was Over? These 18 Charts Show The Real Crisis That Lies Ahead
Investors Storm Oregon’s Cannabis Market To Build 'Starbucks of Weed'
Bitcoin Payment Processor BIPS Attacked, Over $1m Stolen
State Regulators Force Vermont's Only Bitcoin ATM Offline
MI woman released after 11 days in jail for cursing
White House dodges question on Sanjay Gupta’s marijuana reversal
Why So Many Cambodians Own Donut Shops
Why Tech Employees Are Rebelling Against Their Bosses
Customs Can Search Your Phone Illegally, Then Kick You Out of the USA
3 Time Emmy Winning CNN Journalist: Media Runs Paid Propaganda For FOREIGN Dictator
Do You Live in a “Death Spiral” State?