“I fully concede, a default of any kind would be harmful to individuals and institutions holding Treasury bonds in their portfolios. It would cause investors and analysts to rethink the role that T-bills play in the financial system and could cause some painful adjustments. But why should these be the only costs under consideration? What about the cost to the US taxpayer from raising the revenues needed to pay the interest on T-bills? What about the costs to everyone holding assets denominated in depreciating dollars — depreciation that will continue as long as the Fed maintains its policy of monetizing the debt?”
http://bastiat.mises.org/2013/10/more-on-default/
Related posts:
Everything you need to know about BitCoin
Ryan and Biden: Birds of a Feather
Gerald Celente: The Financial System Is Collapsing Before Our Eyes
The Basket Case Sometimes Known as Japan
Syria: Act of War or Military Strike?
Hawks Take Flight: Why the Fed's Hypocritical Dialectic Continues
Portugal May Become the First of Europe’s Bankrupt Welfare States to Recover: Less Spending AND Lowe...
These Guys
The Paul Ryan Record – Not as Fiscally Conservative as You Think
Suddenly, Banks Are Victims In Justice Department's S&P Lawsuit
The Economist Hoists Its Battle Balloon?
Edward Snowden and the Wolf Who Cried Plant
Central Banking: Sterile as the Grave
The NSA-DEA police state tango
What a case from mid-1700s Scotland tells us about fungibility of money