“I fully concede, a default of any kind would be harmful to individuals and institutions holding Treasury bonds in their portfolios. It would cause investors and analysts to rethink the role that T-bills play in the financial system and could cause some painful adjustments. But why should these be the only costs under consideration? What about the cost to the US taxpayer from raising the revenues needed to pay the interest on T-bills? What about the costs to everyone holding assets denominated in depreciating dollars — depreciation that will continue as long as the Fed maintains its policy of monetizing the debt?”
http://bastiat.mises.org/2013/10/more-on-default/
Related posts:
Is This Why Obama is So Desperate for a Nice Little War?
Herding the Sheeple into Government-Controlled Health Care
Foreclosures are the Solution, Not the Problem
Tax jurisdiction: Is space the final frontier?
Jeffrey Tucker: The Triumph of Scrooge McDuck
Anthony Gregory: Do We Want a ‘Stop-and-Frisk’ Society?
College Girls, Bottled Water and the Emerging American Police State
The UK Recovery that Isn't ... the Market Recovery that Is
Paul Craig Roberts: Will Obama Doom Himself As A War Criminal
Electronic Walls, Property and Government
'HELP: Detroit is Waiting to be Rescued!'
Glenn Greenwald: Obama's justice department grants final immunity to Bush's CIA torturers
Bill Bonner: Is Capitalism Doomed?
Gerald Celente: Sneak Peek At New Trends Journal & Boston Tragedy
The Oil Patch Will Rise Again
