
“A sweeping set of changes to the New York City Police Department’s controversial ‘stop-and-frisk’ program has been put on hold. An appeals court stayed the changes, effectively postponing the operations of the monitor, while allowing police officers to continue using stop-and-frisk tactics. In a striking move, the court also took the unusual step of removing Scheindlin from the case, saying she had ‘ran afoul’ of the judiciary’s code of conduct and compromised the ‘appearance of impartiality surrounding this litigation’ by granting media interviews while the case was pending before her.”
Related posts:
Chinese Stocks Tumble As H.K. Officials Monitor Surge In ATM Withdrawals
Diabolically dishonest: Lewin Group’s MMR-Autism sibling study
Daddy Bloomberg Wants to Require Retailers to Hide Tobacco
Undercover agents made over 100 Silk Road purchases, tested 'high purity'
Obomber: US may be forced to “wipe out” Syrian air defenses
Cops Interrogate Family For Allowing Kids To Play Outside
Republicans: Abandon Benghazi, and Talk about Hillary’s Other Foibles
Paulson Offsets Gold Bullion ETF Sale with Gold Swaps
Lawyers: Illegal body cavity searches of women standard policy at Texas traffic stops
Court Gives a Christmas Victory to Atlanta Street Vendors
Parents from faith-healing church charged in diabetes death of daughter
Flying and Driving with Weed: The 2013 Holidays
A Frontrunner for the 2013 Bureaucrat-of-the-Year Award?
“3% Down” Mortgages: They’re Back!
Woman dies after genital kick from LAPD officer