“A sweeping set of changes to the New York City Police Department’s controversial ‘stop-and-frisk’ program has been put on hold. An appeals court stayed the changes, effectively postponing the operations of the monitor, while allowing police officers to continue using stop-and-frisk tactics. In a striking move, the court also took the unusual step of removing Scheindlin from the case, saying she had ‘ran afoul’ of the judiciary’s code of conduct and compromised the ‘appearance of impartiality surrounding this litigation’ by granting media interviews while the case was pending before her.”
Related posts:
Indiana education commissioner made sure GOP donor’s charter school got top marks
White House Planning Private Spies to Counter “Deep State” Enemies
Why Are California's Legal Marijuana Sales So Low?
Bradley Manning’s trial is no more than a ‘judicial lynching’
Gold Is Rebounding, Time to Look at Franco Nevada
Will Disney Soon Be Able to Break into Computers... Legally?
Does Free Money Exist?
Customs & Border Protection Logged Eight-Fold Increase in Drone Surveillance for Other Agencies
The Purpose of Government is to Exploit -- and Exacerbate -- a Crisis
Clapper: Election Meddling And Regime Change In The "Best Interests Of The People"
Boycott Israel & you won’t get aid donations, Hurricane Harvey victims told
Hackers turn Square reader into card skimmer in under 10 minutes
Watch As City Changes Parking Signs Then Issues Tickets To Cars That Had Been Parked Legally
IRS Targeted Organizations Named With the Words "Tea Party" Or "Patriot"
We Finally Won One Against the Police State!