“Randy Schekman, one of the 2013 crop of Nobel prize-winners (for physiology or medicine, in his case), levels two charges against such journals. The first is that, aware of their pre-eminence and keen to protect it, they artificially restrict the number of papers they accept. Second, he argues that science as a whole is being distorted by perverse incentives, especially the tyranny of the ‘impact factor’, a number that purports to measure how important a given journal is. Researchers who publish in journals with a high impact factor—like the three named above—can expect promotion, pay rises and professional accolades. Those that do not can expect obscurity or even the sack.”
Related posts:
Saudi princess snaps up luxurious Geneva estate for $62 million
Ohio governor wants to tax funerals, concerts, parking garages
Officer fired after trying to give phony insurance ticket to politician
Dutch finance minister says new support for Greece 'inevitable'
The sun is setting on dollar supremacy, and with it, American power
FAA chief: Don't fear the Reapers (or Predators, Global Hawks, other drones)
The world's first Bitcoin escort agency
Licensed Marijuana Grower Sues Cops For Killing His Plants
FBI admits flaws in hair analysis over decades; 14 prisoners already dead
Revisiting the ‘Crack Babies’ Epidemic That Was Not
Police Shoot Woman Dead After She Called 911 to Report an Assault
New California Water Law Restricts Individuals To 55 Gallons Per Day By 2022
Fed Pulls QE3 Trigger; Will Buy Mortgages in Effort to Lower Rates
Oklahoma medical marijuana petition drive underway for November
Argentines Turn Cash Into Condos in Miami