“Randy Schekman, one of the 2013 crop of Nobel prize-winners (for physiology or medicine, in his case), levels two charges against such journals. The first is that, aware of their pre-eminence and keen to protect it, they artificially restrict the number of papers they accept. Second, he argues that science as a whole is being distorted by perverse incentives, especially the tyranny of the ‘impact factor’, a number that purports to measure how important a given journal is. Researchers who publish in journals with a high impact factor—like the three named above—can expect promotion, pay rises and professional accolades. Those that do not can expect obscurity or even the sack.”
Related posts:
Turkey treating Iraqi Kurdistan ‘as independent’
French competition watchdog raids Apple stores
‘Urban mining’ for precious metals in e-waste more fruitful than traditional mining
Sony Corporation Using Amazon Servers To Attack Torrent Sites
Airbus patents plane that could fly from Paris to Tokyo in three hours
Why Buffalo wings will break your budget in 2013
New York ‘cannibal’ cop watched death porn: wife
Middle East oil companies targeted in cyber war
Lithuania turns Google Street View on tax cheats
EU to ban high-energy hair dryers, smartphones and kettles
Gold Runs Out In Lisbon As Price Drop Compounds Money Misery
Former NJ police officer sentenced to 20 months
Hong Kong Mercantile Exchange closes its doors; investors compensated in cash
Estonia's 1st electronic residency card issued to UK journalist
NYC health board bans super-sized, sugary drinks