“The Second Circuit court erred in ruling that Hedges would need to be illegally detained before he could have standing to challenge his detention. This is insane, given that he would then be held without due process and would have no means to challenge his detention (Catch 22). Our attorneys want to argue that Hedges has standing because the detention is impacting Hedge’s freedom of the press, thereby creating the kind of ‘case or controversy’ that has traditionally created standing. The Second Court also mistakenly misread the provision as PREVENTING such detentions, when it actually authorizes them. The proposed brief will correct this error.”
http://www.downsizedc.org/blog/can-we-convince-the-supreme-court-to-end-legalized-kidnapping
Related posts:
California DMV Investigates Potential Large-Scale Data Breach
Cops with Drones: Alameda Co., CA Weighs Technology vs. Privacy
U.S. Regime Change in Syria in 1949 … and 1957, 1986, 1991 and 2011-Today
Kansas Couple SWAT Raided After Tea Was Mistaken for Marijuana
WarGames for real: How one 1983 exercise nearly triggered WWIII
Uncle Sam’s Growing Student Loan Portfolio
ATF's Operation Gideon Raises Questions of Fairness, Justice, and Race
The Dutch do what the Germans couldn't: Get their gold back
Housing: Addicted to Fiat Money
“Stomp on Jesus’ Name or Flunk My Class,” Says Professor. Student Refuses. Gone!
Berkeley, CA Replacing Municipal Debt With Blockchain Crowdfunding
Robohand: How cheap 3D printers built a replacement hand for a five-year old boy
New York Jewish Officials, Rabbis meet Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Not Seen On TV
Blockchain.info Generates $300,000 Monthly Revenue
Maker Nabs A 3D Model Of Marcus Aurelius With Google Glass