“The case was McCulloch v. Maryland (1819). The legal issue: Could the state of Maryland tax the Second Bank of the United States? It was a private bank. The issue, as stated by Chief Justice Marshall in a long, detailed decision, was this: Does the Constitution allow Congress to charter a bank? That was what Congress did in 1791: the [First] Bank of the United States. It was a central bank. Its charter lapsed in 1811. The Second Bank of the United States was chartered by Congress in 1816. In 1818, Maryland voted to tax the Bank. The Bank refused to pay. The Supreme Court decided in favor of McCulloch, an agent of the Bank.”
http://www.garynorth.com/public/12007.cfm
Related posts:
Coinsetter CEO’s Message to Banks: You Will Soon Love Bitcoin
Was Keynes a Brilliant Investor?
“Why I Set Up an Offshore Company”
Cuba's Past Could Be Your Future
Reflections on 9/11 and the High Cost of Waging War in the Middle East
John Hussman: Durable Returns, Transient Returns
When Zero’s Too High: Time preference versus central bankers
Taxation and Trading on Foreign Markets
Wendy McElroy: Don't Like My Article? I Will Sue!
Detlev Schlichter: “Watching your money disappear” – Speech to senior representatives of the UK pens...
How to Survive a Plane Crash: 10 Tips That Could Save Your Life
Ten Things to Expect from Obamacare in 2014
Happy Tax Freedom Day?
Neofeudalism's Tax Donkeys and the Battle for Control of Resources
Naomi Wolf: The coming drone attack on America
