“After the 1970s, real capital played a smaller and smaller role. It was replaced by credit and its sinister twin: debt. The r in Piketty’s now famous annotation r > g is supposed to represent the return on capital investment. But where did the wad come from? Savings rates went down. Real earnings went down. Growth rates went down. So how could there be more capital available and how could it produce higher rates of return (compared to economic growth)? The whole thing is a headache for a thoughtful man. Capital investments with no real capital behind them. Profits that outstrip the economic growth from which they must come. What to make of it?”
http://www.bonnerandpartners.com/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-wealth-inequality-debate/
Related posts:
The Will Of The People Doesn’t Mean Jack To Drug Warriors
The Blunt Truth about The Trayvon Martin Case
Richard Ebeling On the Coming Crash in China, On Hayek and Much More
James Bovard: Washington secrecy is creating a know-nothing democracy
‘Super Cycle’ in Commodities Is Not Dead — Just the Opposite
NEW Spying Scandal -- Is This One the Last Straw?
Thanks, Bloomberg, for More Nonsense About Gold
U.S. Government vs. DEFCAD 3D Printable Gun: You Can’t Fix Stupid
Why Are Bond Yields Falling as Stocks Rally?
Ron Paul: Iraq, The 'Liberation' Neocons Would Rather Forget
Paul Craig Roberts: Gangster State US/UK
Lindsey Graham Should Have Visited Iran
Krugman: Germany Needs a Bubble To Save the Euro
Bovard: A politically weaponized FBI is nothing new, but plenty dangerous
US Media Shops North Korea, Russia 'Doomsday' Nuke Narratives
