“Strengthening copper prices, for example, do not immediately result in increased copper production in many market cycles, because the production cycle requires new deposits to be discovered, financed, and constructed—a process that can consume a decade. Price declines—even declines below the industry’s total production costs—do not immediately cause massive production cuts. The ‘sunk capital’ involved in discovery and construction of mining projects and attendant infrastructure (such as smelters, railways, and ports) causes the industry to produce down to, and sometimes below, their cash costs of production.”
http://www.caseyresearch.com/articles/why-the-resource-supercycle-is-still-intact
Related posts:
The Devil's Chessboard: How the First CIA Director Collaborated With Nazis
Why I Am Leaving California After 52 Years
Cuba's Past Could Be Your Future
A territorial tax system would help U.S. exports, jobs and prosperity
Last Hurrah of the Interventionists?
Housing “Bubble 2.0″; Same as “Bubble 1.0″, only different actors
Stefan Molyneux: The Truth About How The US Will Save Syria
The Syria Endgame: Strategic Stage in the Pentagon’s Covert War on Iran
FATCA: a Tool of the Electronic Surveillance State
A Dozen Things I’ve Learned From Michael Mauboussin About Investing
'Work' as Low as the TSA's
Bill Bonner: Why the Fed’s ‘Taper’ Won’t Work
The case against cronies: Libertarians must stand up to corporate greed
Jeffrey Tucker: The Freedom of Rose Wilder Lane
The Gold Roller Coaster