“Making taxpayers shell out for abuses committed by officers does nothing to pressure departments to reform their use of force. The costs are hidden and dispersed among all taxpayers, and even if a few people read about it in the paper and are annoyed, they don’t have the incentive (or even the mechanism) to force the police department to change officers’s incentives or hold them accountable. That’s just the way government bureaucracies and unions like it. The problem here is the doctrine of ‘qualified immunity,’ which shields police officers from being held liable for violating people’s rights.”
Related posts:
The U.S. Dollar’s Days are Numbered …
Your Artificial Knee Might Get You Groped
Middletown CT Police Don't Obey The 4th Amendment
Last Week’s Mortgage Applications Were at a 13-Year Low
Jim Rogers: 50% Correction in Markets not Uncommon
Hoarding Gold: China’s Plan for Survival
$4.1m goes missing as Chinese bitcoin trading platform GBL vanishes
Global Markets Hitting All-Time Highs
Public Opinion: Government Healthcare? No!
It’s Official: New OVDP program designed for Swiss Banks
Why Have So Many Americans Considered Expatriation?
California Gov. Brown tells the Obama administration to back off on marijuana
There Are Now At Least 14 Digital Currencies Worth More Than $1
Why You Should Triple-Check the Ticker Before Buying That Stock
Still no list of Q4 2012 ex-Americans in the Federal Register