
“Making taxpayers shell out for abuses committed by officers does nothing to pressure departments to reform their use of force. The costs are hidden and dispersed among all taxpayers, and even if a few people read about it in the paper and are annoyed, they don’t have the incentive (or even the mechanism) to force the police department to change officers’s incentives or hold them accountable. That’s just the way government bureaucracies and unions like it. The problem here is the doctrine of ‘qualified immunity,’ which shields police officers from being held liable for violating people’s rights.”
Related posts:
Multiple New Polls Show Americans Reject Wholesale NSA Domestic Spying
Bill Bonner: An Empire of Debt Leading to a "Crack-up" in the Global Monetary System
0-day bug in fully patched OS X comes under active exploit to hijack Macs
Homicide convictions upheld for faith-healer parents whose daughter died
Wisconsin town to charge parents $114 fine if child accused of bullying
Court: School Officials Accountable for Strip-Searching 10-Year-Old Over $20
Ohio University Considers Mandatory Re-Education Classes For Smokers
Europe: Cliff Ahead?
IRS: Cheapest Obamacare Plan Will Cost $20,000 per Family by 2016
Are We Really "Going Dark"? -- The DEA and Apple's iMessage
Gold replaces narcotics as the most valued smuggled item in India
What the Passport Pitchmen Don't Tell You...
Bitcoin a Refuge For Argentines Tired of Government's Currency Despotism
World’s First Bitcoin ATM Set to Go Live Tuesday
Big Brother Trump Is Watching