
“If an individual is declared by the president, the secretary of state, or the secretary of the treasury to be a ‘sanctioned person,’ he (or she) will be unable to obtain access to his accounts, will be unable to process any loans (or make them), or move them to any other financial institution inside or outside the United States. The EO expands its authority by making him unable to use any third party such as ‘a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, subgroup or other organization’ that might wish to help him or allow him to obtain access to his funds. If the individual so ‘sanctioned’ decides that the ruling is unfair, he isn’t allowed to sue.”
Related posts:
El Chapo v. Longstanding CIA Global Drugs Trafficking
Whom to Believe on Gold: Central Banks or Bloomberg?
Manhattan Newsstand Owner Accepts Bitcoins Instead Of Credit Cards
Why China is Leading the Global Rise of Bitcoin
Cops Interrogate Family For Allowing Kids To Play Outside
U.S. Dropped 23,144 Bombs on Muslim-Majority Countries in 2015
National weather agency spared from furloughs after rash of tornadoes
David Stockman: There are Bubbles All Over, Hide in Cash
Lawmaker: My ‘gut feeling’ says Syria got chemical weapons from Iraq
$17,000 Linux-powered rifle brings “auto-aim” to the real world
Dear brands: stop remembering 9/11
Government Civil Liberties Panel Endorses NSA Surveillance
Feds put heat on Web firms for master encryption keys
Austin Police Union Thug Wayne Vincent Threatens Peaceful Streets Project With Violence
Larry Summers's Billion-Dollar Bad Bet at Harvard