
“After riots swept parts of the United Kingdom last year, I wrote about the moral argument for gun ownership. Simply stated, it is wrong to disarm law-abiding people, particularly when there is a risk of societal breakdown. The same argument is equally applicable in the areas ravaged by the recent storm to hit the northeastern United States. As you can see from this report in the New York Post, the government is failing in its responsibility to provide law and order.”
Related posts:
Swiss expats unhappy with FATCA deal
Oppose the War: Send Congress a History Lesson
Max Keiser Interviews Cody Wilson of Defense Distributed
Jews say no to AIPAC and say no to bombing Syria
$11 Trillion Increase in Federal Debt in One Year
What Was Bradley Manning’s Sin?
Campus Gun Free Zone Did Not Stop a Dangerous Gunman….Guns Did
Here's Why You Think Inflation Is Much Higher Than the Government Says
An Ex-Con Helps Save a Stranger; an Ex-Cop (Allegedly) Murders One
Meet America’s next pension casualty: the inventor of chocolate sprinkles
Quite Simply The Biggest Endorsement That Bitcoin Has Ever Received
Israel Names Chairman of JPMorgan Chase International the New Central Bank Chief
Iran’s new president promises: We will never make nuclear weapons
When the US Invaded Russia
Florida County Moves To Shut Down Red Light Cameras With Public Vote