
“The Cuban embargo demonstrated one of the core principles of the national-security state: that the end, which was the preservation of ‘national security,’ justified whatever means were necessary to achieve it. If national security required the government to inflict great suffering on the Cuban people, then that’s just what would have to be done. Nothing could be permitted to stand in the way of protecting national security, whatever that term meant. What mattered was that the national-security establishment — i.e., the military and the CIA — knew what national security meant and had the ultimate responsibility for protecting it.”
http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd1205a.asp
Related posts:
“Intellectual Property”: This Land was Made for You an … er, for Monsanto
Why a single mom is better off with a $29,000 job than a $69,000 job
Detroit, Demographics and Detonation
The Disturbing Truth Behind Your Next Income Tax Return
Montgomery bus segregation was a government program
The Logic of the Police State
The Problem With Altcoins
Thaddeus Russell: 'A Renegade History of the United States'
11 Secret Documents Americans Deserve to See
Bill Bonner: What Do Bond Investors Know That Stock Investors Don’t?
It Won't Stay in Vegas: The Metro PD's Homeland Security Theater
The Worst Law Most Americans Have Never Heard Of
Digital Apocalypse: An Interview with Cody Wilson
Bill Bonner: An Important Update on Our New ‘Trade of the Decade’
Robert P. Murphy: The Economics of Bitcoin