
“The Cuban embargo demonstrated one of the core principles of the national-security state: that the end, which was the preservation of ‘national security,’ justified whatever means were necessary to achieve it. If national security required the government to inflict great suffering on the Cuban people, then that’s just what would have to be done. Nothing could be permitted to stand in the way of protecting national security, whatever that term meant. What mattered was that the national-security establishment — i.e., the military and the CIA — knew what national security meant and had the ultimate responsibility for protecting it.”
http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd1205a.asp
Related posts:
By the Numbers: Does Immigration Cause Crime?
Taxation and Trading on Foreign Markets
ICANN: How top-down ‘implementation’ replaced bottom-up policymaking
Obama Follows Bush's Iraq Playbook
A Marine Sergeant Speaks Out
Why US government IT fails so hard, so often
Ten Ways to Reduce Terrorism - Can We Admit The War On Terror Has Failed?
Ron Paul: Nixon’s Vindication
Labor Day 2013: How To Get and Keep a Job in a Fast-Changing Economy
Bill Bonner: How I Explained Bitcoin to My 94-Year-Old Mother
The Original Value of Bitcoins
"Homelanders" To U.S. Expatriates: Don't Come Back... Ever
11 Secret Documents Americans Deserve to See
Does Innovation Require the Patent Office?
4 Ways Living Abroad Can Give You More Freedom