“The Cuban embargo demonstrated one of the core principles of the national-security state: that the end, which was the preservation of ‘national security,’ justified whatever means were necessary to achieve it. If national security required the government to inflict great suffering on the Cuban people, then that’s just what would have to be done. Nothing could be permitted to stand in the way of protecting national security, whatever that term meant. What mattered was that the national-security establishment — i.e., the military and the CIA — knew what national security meant and had the ultimate responsibility for protecting it.”
http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd1205a.asp
Related posts:
Paul Rosenberg: The Beauty and Dignity of the Productive Class
Move Over, Obamacare. Here Comes Obamaschool
The Market Shall Set North Korea Free
The True Story Behind 300 and Sparta's "Super Soldiers"
The Blindness of Modern Economists
The Politics Of Bitcoin Mixing Services
Nasser Al-Awlaki: The Drone That Killed My Grandson
The astonishing collapse of work in America
Citizenship, identity, mourning loss of identity and moving on …
Jacob Hornberger: Shut Down the Nonessential Drug War
Jacob Hornberger: The Revolutions of Adam Smith and Thomas Jefferson
Donald Trump didn't create presidential dictatorship -- he inherited it
The One Lesson to Learn Before a Market Crash
It’s Up to You, Entrepreneurs: Brad Feld on the Rise of Global Startup Communities
Blowback: How Torture Fuels Terrorism Rather Than Reduces It