
“The Cuban embargo demonstrated one of the core principles of the national-security state: that the end, which was the preservation of ‘national security,’ justified whatever means were necessary to achieve it. If national security required the government to inflict great suffering on the Cuban people, then that’s just what would have to be done. Nothing could be permitted to stand in the way of protecting national security, whatever that term meant. What mattered was that the national-security establishment — i.e., the military and the CIA — knew what national security meant and had the ultimate responsibility for protecting it.”
http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd1205a.asp
Related posts:
The Internet Has Been Conquered: Get Busy With the Next Steps
Is the U.S. at War with Al-Qaeda?
Mike Gogulski: Is America still a democracy? Who cares? It’s DANGEROUS!
How The USA Captures Whistleblowers And Other Political Enemies
The Nearly-Free University
Will Grigg: Prison Profiteers
The Real State Secret: Spies Aren't Very Good At Their Jobs
Are You A Good Candidate For Expatriation?
Paul Craig Roberts: The Case of the Missing Recovery
Higher Education Cartel, Meet Creative Destruction
G. Edward Griffin on Globalism, Collectivism and the 'Right Principles'
Chris Martenson: Bankers Own the World - And are ultimately destroying it
Is The Safety Of The State Really Worth More Than The Truth?
Missing After World War I: The Tomb of the Unknown Civilian
A congressional speech on the centennial of the Expatriation Act of 1868