
“The Cuban embargo demonstrated one of the core principles of the national-security state: that the end, which was the preservation of ‘national security,’ justified whatever means were necessary to achieve it. If national security required the government to inflict great suffering on the Cuban people, then that’s just what would have to be done. Nothing could be permitted to stand in the way of protecting national security, whatever that term meant. What mattered was that the national-security establishment — i.e., the military and the CIA — knew what national security meant and had the ultimate responsibility for protecting it.”
http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd1205a.asp
Related posts:
"Ferguson Effect": Increased Police Lethality, More Prosecutorial Deference
NSA's surveillance "most serious attacks on free speech we’ve ever seen."
The Market Shall Set North Korea Free
Casey's Louis James Warns: 'Don't Try to Time the Market'
Hey, kids – let’s talk about heroin!
CIA created 9/11 blowback, American citizens paid
In France's Welfare State Status Quo, Are We Seeing America's Future?
How Rigid Alliances Have Locked Us Into Unwanted Conflicts
Jacob Hornberger: Why Not Simply Abolish the CIA?
Is The Everything Bubble Ready to Pop?
Federal Reserve Policy Failures Are Mounting
James Altucher: How To Break All The Rules And Get Everything You Want
Is the U.S. at War with Al-Qaeda?
Deputizing America
The Supreme Court’s Deference to the Pentagon