“The Cuban embargo demonstrated one of the core principles of the national-security state: that the end, which was the preservation of ‘national security,’ justified whatever means were necessary to achieve it. If national security required the government to inflict great suffering on the Cuban people, then that’s just what would have to be done. Nothing could be permitted to stand in the way of protecting national security, whatever that term meant. What mattered was that the national-security establishment — i.e., the military and the CIA — knew what national security meant and had the ultimate responsibility for protecting it.”
http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd1205a.asp
(Visited 31 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
The State: Always the Accuser, Never the Defendant
The Myth of the Free-Market American Health Care System [2012]
Is America Too Big?
Sending Money Home: Technology or Bureaucracy?
This is the way they’ll ‘nationalize’ gold
George Orwell Surely Would Be Amused by the Statolatry in the United Kingdom
Nick Giambruno: Securing Your Assets When Financial Privacy Is Dead
The One Lesson to Learn Before a Market Crash
David Galland: Scenarios
Deputizing America
What I Learned About Life Interviewing 80 Highly Successful People
Central Planning by Central Bankers
The Market Shall Set North Korea Free
The Creative Destruction of New York in 47 Seconds
Top 10 Reasons Why the Mafia is Better than the State