
“The Cuban embargo demonstrated one of the core principles of the national-security state: that the end, which was the preservation of ‘national security,’ justified whatever means were necessary to achieve it. If national security required the government to inflict great suffering on the Cuban people, then that’s just what would have to be done. Nothing could be permitted to stand in the way of protecting national security, whatever that term meant. What mattered was that the national-security establishment — i.e., the military and the CIA — knew what national security meant and had the ultimate responsibility for protecting it.”
http://www.fff.org/freedom/fd1205a.asp
Related posts:
The American Empire vs. Your Retirement Prospects
Bill Bonner: Tough luck for investors!
Cannabis: History, Legalization, Regulation, & the Public Health Model
3 Reasons the ‘Nothing to Hide’ Crowd Should Be Worried About Government Surveillance
Incredible confusions: Why ‘austerity’ if we can just print the money?
Paul Craig Roberts: How to Stop Obama’s Military Aggression Against Syria
Ron Paul: Meaningless Words in Politics
Pippa Malmgren on Success
Disarm the police, not the citizens
Being an Austrian Is Easier Than Ever
Diamonds, Advertising, DeBeers and Sex
The Fantasy of Debt: No Trade-Offs, No Sacrifices
Bill Bonner: The Fed’s Childishly Naïve Theory of Credit
Reforms of Domestic Government Surveillance
The Deep State or Invisible Government: A Brief Bibliographic Retrospective