“The trial was most notable for the way in which the court tried to bully the jury. When the jury did not come back with guilty verdicts, but a verdict that simply said ‘guilty of speaking to an assembly,’ the court refused to accept that outcome and ordered the jury to return to their deliberations. When the jury returned with a verdict that acquitted Mead of all charges, the court ordered the jury to prison! Next, the jurors filed a writ of habeas corpus challenging the legality of their imprisonment. Soon after, an important legal precedent was set for jury independence: jurors cannot be punished for voting their conscience.”
http://www.policemisconduct.net/today-jury-rights-day/
Related posts:
Anti-marijuana New York assemblyman busted for weed possession
Phoenix Police “Help” a Man to Death
Glenn Greenwald: The lame rules for presidential debates: a perfect microcosm of US democracy
Gazprom Begins Accepting Payment For Oil In Ruble, Yuan
Hacking an Airplane With Only an Android Phone
San Antonio Public School Officials End RFID Tracking Program
Boardwalk Violinist vs. City Hall: Challenging Ocean City's Noise Ban
Citizen Arrested at Suspicionless Checkpoint for Not Obeying Petty Commands
Venezuela Devalues Bolivar By Another 44%; Inflation Rages At 50%
Authorities Want Remote Access To Californians’ Home CCTV Footage
Study: Drug Dogs Most Likely To Err In Traffic Stop Scenarios
White House leans on industry for bottled water push
Patent Troll with Patent on Podcasting Threatens to Shut Down—or Shake Down—Podcasters
General Wesley Clark: Wars Were Planned - Seven Countries In Five Years
How the Feds Use Transportation Funds to Spy on You