“‘We interpret the slightly more colorful comments made by the trial court in its ruling from the bench on the defendant’s suppression motion as a finding, as a factual matter, that the defendant passed all of the field sobriety tests that he was given,’ Judge John Everett Williams wrote for the three-judge panel. ‘The state is not required to perform field sobriety tests on an individual prior to arresting him or her for driving under the influence. However, if the state chooses to administer such tests, it may not simply disregard the results if the individual involved performs them successfully.'”
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/38/3889.asp
Related posts:
Dwolla CEO Ben Milne: Why charge 25 cents for an $11 million transaction
ANZ opens Gold vault in Singapore
The Anti-Hong Kong: Tanzania Bans Private Statistics
Bitcoin Foundation Jon Matonis Interview
The NSA: And Who Will Watch the Watchmen?
Obama delivers ‘full-throated defense’ of Larry Summers to House Democrats
BitPay Banks $510K In Investment To Become PayPal for Bitcoin, Already Has 2,100 Businesses On Board
Internet Sales Tax Passes the Senate, 69 to 27
National Microphone Spy System Capable of Recording Conversations
25 Quotes About The Coming War With Syria That Every American Should See
CA “Heroes” Beat Motorist Over Tinted Windows, “Missing” Front Plate
Murray Sabrin: Cuba, part two, the economy
Video Shows San Antonio Police Beating Pregnant Woman
Rail Fails While Pipelines Prevail
Americans Realize Washington Is the Problem, Support Cap to Control Spending