“‘We interpret the slightly more colorful comments made by the trial court in its ruling from the bench on the defendant’s suppression motion as a finding, as a factual matter, that the defendant passed all of the field sobriety tests that he was given,’ Judge John Everett Williams wrote for the three-judge panel. ‘The state is not required to perform field sobriety tests on an individual prior to arresting him or her for driving under the influence. However, if the state chooses to administer such tests, it may not simply disregard the results if the individual involved performs them successfully.'”
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/38/3889.asp
(Visited 91 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
DOJ Creates New Position To Target “Anti-Government Views”
US Drug Policy and the Border Child Immigration Crisis
‘This is hypocrisy’: Sanjay Gupta on the federal medical marijuana patent
20 Ways FATCA Will Catch Americans
A Ceasefire in the IRS’ War on US Citizens?
How High Could Bitcoin Value Soar? - Satoshi's Billion Dollar Pizza
Audacious Hack Exposes Bush Family Pix, E-Mail, Clinton Friendship
The Emerging Bitcoin Civil War
So Many People Are Fleeing the S.F. Bay Area, It's Hard to Find a U-Haul
Ex-Military General Dynamics Contractor: 'I Hereby Resign in Protest Effective Immediately'
Bank of Canada Holds Swiss, Dutch, Swedish Gold
Unintended Consequence: Colorado’s Gun Control Law Kills Gun Buy-Back Program.
Documenting "Detainee Treatment [sic for 'Torture']"
Jim Rogers on investing in Malaysia, the century of Asia, & frontier markets
Corrupt Cops Protecting Rodeo Board Caught by Their Own Cruiser Camera