
“‘We interpret the slightly more colorful comments made by the trial court in its ruling from the bench on the defendant’s suppression motion as a finding, as a factual matter, that the defendant passed all of the field sobriety tests that he was given,’ Judge John Everett Williams wrote for the three-judge panel. ‘The state is not required to perform field sobriety tests on an individual prior to arresting him or her for driving under the influence. However, if the state chooses to administer such tests, it may not simply disregard the results if the individual involved performs them successfully.'”
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/38/3889.asp
Related posts:
Detroit makes millions from parking meters, can't afford to power them
Florida: Changing Car Color Does Not Justify Traffic Stop
The Rise of RFID 'Smart Guns'
Analysts: Muni-Bond Selloff Looks Like Lehman All Over Again
Bank of Greece Breaks Silence on Bitcoin
A “Hidden” Bear Market Is Brewing
Ben Swann: President Obama Wants To Protect Children? Why Not End U.S. Drone Strikes?
Walking in Broad Daylight is “Suspicious” Behavior
The Terrifying Future of The United States
Global elite to criminalize "unexplained wealth" in crackdown on e-cash
23% of America Is Illiterate
More DHS-funded Police Surveillance Cameras; No Drop in Crime
Obama wants China to stop copying the NSA's surveillance plans
Sophisticated Spy Tool ‘The Mask’ Rages Undetected for 7 Years
Cops Barge Into Home, Take Baby After Parents Seek 2nd Medical Opinion