
“‘We interpret the slightly more colorful comments made by the trial court in its ruling from the bench on the defendant’s suppression motion as a finding, as a factual matter, that the defendant passed all of the field sobriety tests that he was given,’ Judge John Everett Williams wrote for the three-judge panel. ‘The state is not required to perform field sobriety tests on an individual prior to arresting him or her for driving under the influence. However, if the state chooses to administer such tests, it may not simply disregard the results if the individual involved performs them successfully.'”
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/38/3889.asp
Related posts:
FinCEN: Bitcoin Miners Need Not Register as Money Transmitters
Why Firing a Bad Cop Is Damn Near Impossible
Spain Issues Retroactive 0.03% Tax on Bank Deposits
Penning the Sheep for a Shearing—Capital Controls, Part 2
Aaron Swartz's Girlfriend Explains 'Why Aaron Died'
"We're building a domestic army": Marine Corps Colonel speaks out
Central bank further restricts gold imports in India
U.N. Urged to Treat Medical Marijuana As Human Right
Adam Kokesh Arrested Again at Smoke Down Prohibition in Washington, DC
Jimmy Carter Defends Edward Snowden, Says NSA Spying Has Compromised Nation's Democracy
Human-to-Rat, Brain-to-Brain Control Achieved By Neuro Scientists
Gold Rush Fever Hits Nome, Alaska
Reality Check: Who Is Behind The Commission on Presidential Debates? Are The Debates Rigged?
Forget Too Big to Fail Banks — It's Time to Break Up the Fed
Two Dark Money Groups Outspending All Super PACs Combined