“‘We interpret the slightly more colorful comments made by the trial court in its ruling from the bench on the defendant’s suppression motion as a finding, as a factual matter, that the defendant passed all of the field sobriety tests that he was given,’ Judge John Everett Williams wrote for the three-judge panel. ‘The state is not required to perform field sobriety tests on an individual prior to arresting him or her for driving under the influence. However, if the state chooses to administer such tests, it may not simply disregard the results if the individual involved performs them successfully.'”
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/38/3889.asp
(Visited 91 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
House Democrat Wants States To Get Paid To Seize Guns
After extracting $1 billion bribe from ZTE, Commerce Dept. partially lifts ban
Barrett Brown Faces 105 Years in Jail
Austerity's End Could Bring Additional German Turmoil
Pat Buchanan: Chemical Attack 'Reeks Of False Flag Operation'
Police Crack Down On High Schoolers' Nerf Gun Battle
CIA Analyst Michael Scheuer Exposes Syrian War Lobbyists
88% of Missing Sex Trafficked Kids Come from US Foster Care
US plans to kick Assad out by treating Syria like North Korea
Kryptokit Launches as Dark Wallet’s Biggest Rival
$90 million spent on now-abandoned Maryland Obamacare exchange
North Carolina Court To Decide Whether Firemen Can Perform Traffic Stops
Illinois Legislative Leaders Sue Governor Over Vetoing Lawmakers' Pay Raise
Philly Judge Who Found Cop Not Guilty, Married to Cop
Why Is the U.S. Funding International Drug Rehabs Known for Torture and Abuse?