
“‘We interpret the slightly more colorful comments made by the trial court in its ruling from the bench on the defendant’s suppression motion as a finding, as a factual matter, that the defendant passed all of the field sobriety tests that he was given,’ Judge John Everett Williams wrote for the three-judge panel. ‘The state is not required to perform field sobriety tests on an individual prior to arresting him or her for driving under the influence. However, if the state chooses to administer such tests, it may not simply disregard the results if the individual involved performs them successfully.'”
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/38/3889.asp
Related posts:
The Booming Industry of Legal Marijuana: The Next Dot-Com
Chrome Plug-In for Bitcoin Wallet Attracts Big-Name Talent
Another Maryland Town To Refund Illegal Speed Camera Tickets
NSA harvesting hundreds of millions of personal email contact lists
Kansas Supreme Court Rules Passing Sobriety Test Is Meaningless
Trump's Drug Budget Doubles Down on the War on Drugs
The definition of karma: PayPal president's credit card gets hacked
Elon Musk’s New Hologram Project Invites ‘Iron Man’ Comparisons
What Will Software Eat Next?
David Cameron's proposed encryption ban would 'destroy the internet'
Where Prisoners Are Guaranteed To Private Prisons
Charles Burris: Demonizing Putin Campaign Continues
Mark Spitznagel expecting a 40% stock market crash
As Silk Road 2.0 Pops Up, The Government Needs To Avoid Moral Panic
For months, 911 callers got 'hang up and dial 911' automated message