“‘We interpret the slightly more colorful comments made by the trial court in its ruling from the bench on the defendant’s suppression motion as a finding, as a factual matter, that the defendant passed all of the field sobriety tests that he was given,’ Judge John Everett Williams wrote for the three-judge panel. ‘The state is not required to perform field sobriety tests on an individual prior to arresting him or her for driving under the influence. However, if the state chooses to administer such tests, it may not simply disregard the results if the individual involved performs them successfully.'”
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/38/3889.asp
Related posts:
HSBC Whistleblower Speaks, Uncovered Terrorist Financing
105-year-old woman says eating bacon every day is her key to long life
Bipartisan Hemp, Medical Marijuana Bills Introduced in Congress
Donald Trump’s Tax Cuts and Jobs Act: the expat American’s perspective
The Revolutionary Quantum Computer That May Not Be Quantum at All
Judge declares using Google Maps for driving directions illegal in California
A Solar System Is Installed in the US Every 4 Minutes
BiT Capital commits $10M to BTM startup BiT Access
Nigel Farage on "wholesale, violent revolution" in Europe
Congress’s Plans to Lock You in
Sweden and Norway to add Bitcoin VAT; Norway to implement Bitcoin tax
Have a Gmail Account? Want to See what NSA 'Metadata' Really Means?
Veterans struggle with benefit claims thanks to missing war records
40% of U.S. on Benefits; More Receive Benefits Than Full-Time-Employed
People Love Being Dehumanized by the Security Apparatus