
“‘We interpret the slightly more colorful comments made by the trial court in its ruling from the bench on the defendant’s suppression motion as a finding, as a factual matter, that the defendant passed all of the field sobriety tests that he was given,’ Judge John Everett Williams wrote for the three-judge panel. ‘The state is not required to perform field sobriety tests on an individual prior to arresting him or her for driving under the influence. However, if the state chooses to administer such tests, it may not simply disregard the results if the individual involved performs them successfully.'”
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/38/3889.asp
Related posts:
The Easiest Way to Turn Your Dollars Into Crypto Cash
Vibram required to stop all health claims about its FiveFinger shoes
Gold and Silver Coins in Arizona May Become Legal Tender
Swiss Bank Refuses Request for Cash Withdrawal, Backed By Central Bank
Chinese Gold Rush Underway
The Interior Secretary’s $222,000 Bathroom
Fed Economists: Stocks Are The Cheapest They've Been In 50 Years
Police Officer Fired for Repeated Use of Taser on Senior With Alzheimer's
New Jersey's Attorney General Freaks Out About Bitcoin Mining App
U.S. Admits No Imminent Threat from Syria, No Clear Evidence
Let’s Shed a Tear for those Under-Appreciated Bureaucrats Who Get Lavish Pensions and Live in $700K ...
US Sentencing Commission Votes to Cut Drug Sentences
Student Expelled After Investigation By Cop Who Was Dating His Girlfriend
Muslim Brotherhood: Another Meme Unraveled
WATCH OUT BELOW: S&P 1987 Compared with S&P 2013