
“It may be ‘inconsistent with the New York Times standards’ for one of its reporters to secretly send advanced copy to the CIA and then ask that the agency delete all record that he did so: one certainly hopes it is. But it is not, unfortunately, inconsistent with the paper’s behavior in general, when it comes to reporting on public officials. Serving as obedient lapdogs and message-carriers for political power, rather than adversarial watchdogs over power, is par for the course.”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/aug/29/correspondence-collusion-new-york-times-cia
Related posts:
Syria: Act of War or Military Strike?
Tor and the Silk Road takedown
Bill Bonner: The Making of a Modern Debt Slave...
All I’ll Say About Treyvon Martin
Peter Schiff: Bitcoin vs. Gold
The Real National Security Interest of America
Wendy McElroy: Print Me A Revolution
The Gold Lease Story You Haven’t Heard
Constitution prohibits Trump's pre-emptive strike against N. Korea
Americans Aren’t Buying the Media’s Push For A War In Syria
Ron Paul, Ferguson: The War Comes Home
Doug Casey: The Gold Crash Is Not What Either Bulls or Bears Are Telling You
Ron Paul: The IRS's Job Is To Violate Our Liberties
Bill Bonner: Trump’s Not Like Ike
Will Canada’s hard line on Eritrea’s ‘diaspora’ tax apply to the U.S.?