
“In a recent New York Times column Krugman pronounced Obamacare a success before it has even been tried. Why? Because the premiums to be charged in California health insurance exchange are apparently lower than what the experts thought they would be. Aah… let’s see… Everybody thought health insurance premiums would be 100% higher. In fact, they are only 60% higher… Hooray… Break out the champagne! I’ll come back to these price comparisons in a minute. For the moment, I would ask: What kind of an economist would celebrate an expected price decline without asking what happened to quantity or quality? This is an Econ 101 mistake.”
Related posts:
The Simple Case for Gold
Ron Paul: Beware The Consequences of Pre-Emptive War
Did you miss your IRS agent today?
Junk Bonds Soar in Price as Investors Seek Higher Rates
If Chris Kyle Had Been a Muslim, We'd Call him an Extremist
NDAA: It Still Makes a Mockery Of American Values
Andrew Sullivan Change Of Heart: 'Cameron Proves Greenwald Right'
Pepe Escobar: The illusory state of the Empire
The Real National Security Interest of America
Jacob Hornberger: The Pentagon’s B-52 Message to North Koreans
Justin Raimondo: The Iron Fist in Tampa
The “Moral Obscenity” of Washington’s Empire
An American Stasi
Bill Bonner: The Fed’s Big Lie
"Tax Justice” Report Provides Renewed Justification for Offshore Crackdown