
“In a recent New York Times column Krugman pronounced Obamacare a success before it has even been tried. Why? Because the premiums to be charged in California health insurance exchange are apparently lower than what the experts thought they would be. Aah… let’s see… Everybody thought health insurance premiums would be 100% higher. In fact, they are only 60% higher… Hooray… Break out the champagne! I’ll come back to these price comparisons in a minute. For the moment, I would ask: What kind of an economist would celebrate an expected price decline without asking what happened to quantity or quality? This is an Econ 101 mistake.”
Related posts:
Stodgy Netherlands is nation that’ll blow up euro
Ron Paul: The Sequester 'Crisis' And What Should Be Done
Paul Craig Roberts: Lawlessness Is The New Normal
"Rapid Progress": Controlling the Imperial Military With Drugs
Where’d All the Fear Go?
How Bad Is The Surveillance State?
Ensuring the Boundaries of Truth
Herding the Sheeple into Government-Controlled Health Care
Public Sector Pensions Are a National Issue
5 Urgent Questions for 2013
Stossel: No Regulation? No Problem
The Cunningness of the CIA’s JFK Assassination Cover-Up
CFR: Print Money and Hand It Out Directly to Consumers
Bill Bonner: America’s War in Iraq Was a Fool’s Errand
U.S. Government vs. DEFCAD 3D Printable Gun: You Can’t Fix Stupid