
“A lawyer for the plaintiffs, Bruce Afran, noted that the government’s lawyers told Judge Forrest during arguments after she issued her first temporary injunction in May that they did not know if the administration was using the detention provision. If the government is now arguing that stopping the practice would cause irreparable harm, it shows the administration was indeed using the law and violating the injunction, Afran said.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/14/ndaa-case-indefinite-dentention_n_1885204.html
Related posts:
76% of Americans are living paycheck-to-paycheck
Spain refuses to extradite Swiss bank data 'thief'
China is flooding Silicon Valley with cash
We All Know Who Janet Yellen Is, And That's Terrifying
FBI offers $25,000 reward in $4.9 million fake-police gold heist
Former Miami Herald editor's ties to CIA confirmed in latest JFK docs
Alan Greenspan Sees 'Double Digit' Inflation Ahead
Panetta: US needs to keep up drone war
Obama won’t push Middle East peace initiative in Israel trip
A General Gets Knifed
British terror suspects quietly stripped of citizenship… then killed by drones
Over half of China's new bitcoin traders are women
Ireland is cool for Google as its data servers like the weather
Norwegian student buys $27 in bitcoin in 2009, now owns an apartment
Venezuela To Mandate Fingerprinting Grocery Shoppers By Year End