
“A lawyer for the plaintiffs, Bruce Afran, noted that the government’s lawyers told Judge Forrest during arguments after she issued her first temporary injunction in May that they did not know if the administration was using the detention provision. If the government is now arguing that stopping the practice would cause irreparable harm, it shows the administration was indeed using the law and violating the injunction, Afran said.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/14/ndaa-case-indefinite-dentention_n_1885204.html
Related posts:
President Obama’s Brother Loses Election in Kenya
China Central Bank: No Longer in China’s Interest to Increase Reserves
Man arrested with $153,000 at Nashville airport after dog sniff
Half of U.S. prison sex crimes involve staff
Police chief, police captain, firefighter sentenced for child sex offenses
China defies IMF on mounting credit risk and need for urgent reform
Jim Rogers: An 'even worse catastrophe’ is coming
France Targets Deficit Cut With Tax-Hiking Budget
Liechtenstein mulls lifting banking secrecy
Indiana public schools try to woo students away from vouchers
Kerry's cosy dinner with Syria's 'Hitler' at Damascus restaurant
Malaysia convicts first person under fake news law
NYPD informant who tracked militants quits, denounces police
Bernanke Said to Minimize Asset-Bubble Concern at Meeting
Snapchat market value hits $800 million