
“A lawyer for the plaintiffs, Bruce Afran, noted that the government’s lawyers told Judge Forrest during arguments after she issued her first temporary injunction in May that they did not know if the administration was using the detention provision. If the government is now arguing that stopping the practice would cause irreparable harm, it shows the administration was indeed using the law and violating the injunction, Afran said.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/14/ndaa-case-indefinite-dentention_n_1885204.html
Related posts:
How Do You Mine for Bitcoins?
Detroit Billionaires Get Arena Help as Bankrupt City Suffers
Iraq attacks kill 39 as official escapes assassination
China launches longest-ever manned space mission
Escalating US-China spying war is McKinsey’s loss and Huawei’s gain
Argentina's Bond Yields Lure Back Buyers [March 2014]
New York auction houses celebrate after billion-dollar sales week
The greatest food in human history?
Apple patent filing reveals digital wallet system
New currency in Slovakia?
UN: New generation of secret British courts could conceal torture collusion
Houston schools discuss child's 'Nerf gun' suspension
Guy Who Started Alabama’s Secession Petition Wants His Topless Car Wash Back
China to offer tax breaks to foreign companies after GOP tax bill
Government Itself Still Cited as Top U.S. Problem