
“A lawyer for the plaintiffs, Bruce Afran, noted that the government’s lawyers told Judge Forrest during arguments after she issued her first temporary injunction in May that they did not know if the administration was using the detention provision. If the government is now arguing that stopping the practice would cause irreparable harm, it shows the administration was indeed using the law and violating the injunction, Afran said.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/14/ndaa-case-indefinite-dentention_n_1885204.html
Related posts:
In Terrorism Fight, Government Finds a Surprising Ally: FedEx [2005]
Mongolia at a crossroad as boom brings challenges
Sneak peek: US Mint's gold & silver coins production facility
Ex-IMF Chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn charged with pimping
French workers hold company heads captive after they’re fired without pay
Trump boasts his ‘nuclear button’ is bigger, but he doesn’t really have one
US banker proud to become Chinese national
Officer charged with robbing, extorting targets of police investigations
Bitcoin ATMs coming soon
Asia's Wealthy Outnumber North America's For The First Time
NSA: Surveillance court says no upper limit on phone records collection
Experimental drug cures 70 percent of patients with hepatitis C
Rocky Mountain high: Pot a $200M industry in Colorado
Qaeda-Linked Insurgents Clash With Other Rebels in Syria
Altcoin Investment for Dummies