
“A lawyer for the plaintiffs, Bruce Afran, noted that the government’s lawyers told Judge Forrest during arguments after she issued her first temporary injunction in May that they did not know if the administration was using the detention provision. If the government is now arguing that stopping the practice would cause irreparable harm, it shows the administration was indeed using the law and violating the injunction, Afran said.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/14/ndaa-case-indefinite-dentention_n_1885204.html
Related posts:
Puerto Rico Statehood Experts Challenge Results
Google, unlike Microsoft, must turn over foreign emails: U.S. judge
US security chief calls national debt 'a dire threat'
Japan: Fukushima clean-up will cost $58 billion
Homeland Security worker charged with soliciting kids on Facebook
American Bar Association: Some basic rules for using ‘bitcoin’ as virtual money
Canada Tried Registering Long Guns -- And Gave Up
Chinese state begins buying stocks after Monday's rout
Guardian Editor Says Paper Published Only 1% of Snowden NSA Leaks
Iceland Companies Push to List as Krona Controls Spur Demand
Gadget to stop driver distraction could become compulsory
Insider buying of gold stocks surges to multi-year highs
Obamacare Restrictions Lead Brooklyn Couple To Consider Divorce
Saudis aiding U.S. drone attacks in Yemen: report
New study reveals: Marijuana may slow, halt progression of Alzheimer's