
“A lawyer for the plaintiffs, Bruce Afran, noted that the government’s lawyers told Judge Forrest during arguments after she issued her first temporary injunction in May that they did not know if the administration was using the detention provision. If the government is now arguing that stopping the practice would cause irreparable harm, it shows the administration was indeed using the law and violating the injunction, Afran said.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/14/ndaa-case-indefinite-dentention_n_1885204.html
Related posts:
Brazil Doubles Gold Reserves as Central Banks Buy Bullion
The Five Largest Landowners in the U.S. (Three you probably never heard of)
UN: New generation of secret British courts could conceal torture collusion
Russia to ban US from using Space Station over Ukraine sanctions
Bitcoin Triggers Buzz, Controversy … and Now, Startups
Young Americans may dodge health law
Saudi Arabia agrees to ease Yemen blockade, facing mass starvation warnings
Chinese woman pays for new BMW with mountain of one-yuan notes
Hunger and homelessness rise dramatically in the U.S.
Who killed Bobby Kennedy? His son RFK Jr. doesn’t believe it was Sirhan Sirhan.
Older homeowners falling more into foreclosure
Woman sues Japan’s biggest yakuza boss, seeking refund of ‘protection money'
Hands-free cell phone devices still pose driving risk: study
Former Chicago cop gets 19 years in Latin Kings case
Oklahoma prosecutors return $21,227 more to Interstate 40 travelers