
“A lawyer for the plaintiffs, Bruce Afran, noted that the government’s lawyers told Judge Forrest during arguments after she issued her first temporary injunction in May that they did not know if the administration was using the detention provision. If the government is now arguing that stopping the practice would cause irreparable harm, it shows the administration was indeed using the law and violating the injunction, Afran said.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/14/ndaa-case-indefinite-dentention_n_1885204.html
Related posts:
The heavy hand of the IRS seizes innocent Americans’ assets
Facial Scanning Is Making Gains in Surveillance
U.S. Customs seizes American nurse's $42,000 earmarked for Nigerian clinic
Ron Paul CNN Interview on Election Day 2012
North Korea Reportedly Opening To Foreign Investment
DEA uproots over 578,000 cannabis plants in national parks
Taxpayer Dollars Are Helping Monsanto Sell Seeds Abroad
With its leaders facing trial, Kenya quits International Criminal Court
Record-High 42% of Americans Identify as Independents
New sanctions on Iran introduced to Congress
Sheriff's Deputy Pleads Guilty in DWI Crash
Former Pittsburgh schools police officer faces sex charges
San Francisco Union Protests City's Tax Exemptions for Tech Companies
SecondMarket Seeks to Open Bitcoin Fund to Ordinary Investors
Greek Banks Reopen but Cash Limits Remain and Taxes Soar