
“A lawyer for the plaintiffs, Bruce Afran, noted that the government’s lawyers told Judge Forrest during arguments after she issued her first temporary injunction in May that they did not know if the administration was using the detention provision. If the government is now arguing that stopping the practice would cause irreparable harm, it shows the administration was indeed using the law and violating the injunction, Afran said.”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/14/ndaa-case-indefinite-dentention_n_1885204.html
Related posts:
Who killed Bobby Kennedy? His son RFK Jr. doesn’t believe it was Sirhan Sirhan.
Man shot, paralyzed by police after traffic stop mis-identification
Justin Amash: No Precedent In History For NSA Spying
IRS To Extract $207 Billion From Small Businesses By Enforcing Obamacare
LAPD takes another step toward deploying drones domestically
Catholic Priest Allegedly Beheaded in Syria by Al-Qaeda-Linked Rebels Who Take Pictures and Cheer
GOP Mogul Behind Drug Rehab 'Torture' Centers Bankrolling Opposition to Pot Legalization
Will bourbon help Kentucky swallow Obamacare?
ACLU Sues U.S. Govt Over Secret NO-FLY List
Father Spends 11 Months In Jail, Sues LAPD for Murder Framing
Too much gold around the house? Store it at Texas' new precious metals depository
Iraq executes 21 men in one day on ‘terror’ charges
Another shelter for warehoused immigrant children is planned for Houston
National park police gun down stopped, unarmed motorist in his car
UPS and FedEx Just Got a Major Boost in the Chinese Market