[‘Relatively routine’?] “The US Supreme Court announced on Tuesday that it will take up a case examining whether police officers need a warrant before administering an involuntary blood test to a suspected drunk driver. Although the case deals with a relatively routine interaction between police and motorists, the underlying legal issue will help define the scope of Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches involving forced blood tests.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
(Visited 58 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Church of England declares war on payday loans firm
Mandatory Sentences Face Growing Skepticism
Rock-bottom vacancy rates push Colorado rents to all-time high
Amazon.com gets $252 million tax bill from France
Want to Be Rich? Salary Alone Won't Get You There
Sergey Brin says Google 'failed to be on the bleeding edge' of blockchain
Hong Kong protesters back Edward Snowden, denounce allegations of U.S. spying
China fuels Bitcoin surge to record high
Are there major mistakes in the bombshell economics book of the year?
Bipartisan bill would require a warrant for police to search emails
Meet Mr. Money Mustache, the man who retired at 30
Taxi lender's stock dives after city botches medallion sale disclosure
Edward Snowden: 'The people are still powerless, but now they're aware'
AT&T and T-Mobile embroiled in legal fight over the color magenta
Chicago ‘Safe Passage’ routes put to test amid more shootings