[‘Relatively routine’?] “The US Supreme Court announced on Tuesday that it will take up a case examining whether police officers need a warrant before administering an involuntary blood test to a suspected drunk driver. Although the case deals with a relatively routine interaction between police and motorists, the underlying legal issue will help define the scope of Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches involving forced blood tests.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
In junta-ruled Thailand, reading is now resistance
Man sics cops on kid's lemonade stand, now in license trouble himself
FDA probes deaths linked to Monster Energy drinks
Man Responsible For NY 15-Year Mandatory Minimum Pot Sentences Dies
E-commerce in China: The Alibaba phenomenon
Drones: A Booming Business?
Malaysia convicts first person under fake news law
Spanish unemployment tops 25 percent
Man arrested for posting image of burning poppy on Twitter
Secret Court Ruling Put Tech Companies in Data Bind
Shedding New Light On Basement Marijuana Technology
Police Exempt from Red Light Cameras?
Catholic Priest Allegedly Beheaded in Syria by Al-Qaeda-Linked Rebels Who Take Pictures and Cheer
Widespread placebo prescriptions prompt debate over the ethics of overmedication
Former Mexico president calls for marijuana legalization