[‘Relatively routine’?] “The US Supreme Court announced on Tuesday that it will take up a case examining whether police officers need a warrant before administering an involuntary blood test to a suspected drunk driver. Although the case deals with a relatively routine interaction between police and motorists, the underlying legal issue will help define the scope of Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches involving forced blood tests.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
U.S. Government Calls for Limits on Companies' Use of Web Data
Clear Bitcoin Tax Rules Needed, Taxpayer Advocate Says
Why Police Lie Under Oath
No Negative Rates Without Banning Cash, Says Former Fed Official
A Surprising Health Insurance Option For Those Who Refuse ObamaCare
Afghani accused of murdering and torturing civilian blames U.S. commanders
Work in U.S. and Spain losing its appeal for Latin Americans
DNA database not so anonymous on the Internet: study
NSA Fallout: Berlin Moves to Increase Mobile Phone Security
Thriving UK Housing Market Creates 77,894 More 'Millionaires' Last Year
Brazilian authorities face fresh protests against government corruption despite concessions
CIA 'mistakenly' destroys copy of 6,700-page US torture report
How Venezuelan Used ‘Scrape’ to Make Six Times Her Salary
Military estimates 500 sexual assaults per week
The US government can brand you a terrorist based on a Facebook post