[‘Relatively routine’?] “The US Supreme Court announced on Tuesday that it will take up a case examining whether police officers need a warrant before administering an involuntary blood test to a suspected drunk driver. Although the case deals with a relatively routine interaction between police and motorists, the underlying legal issue will help define the scope of Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches involving forced blood tests.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
Death penalty will be sought against Natchitoches police officer
Cheers erupt as Egyptian president removed and constitution suspended by military
Indonesia Upholds Death Sentence For British Grandmother's Drug Smuggling
Web Pioneer Marc Andreessen Keeps Faith, and Cash, in Bitcoin
Oklahoma medical marijuana petition drive underway for November
Maligned dollar flourishes in Venezuela
1,000 bank workers march on Cyprus’ presidential palace to protest bank restructuring
At the Texas-Mexico border, her son begged not to be taken; they took him anyway.
T.S.A. Expands Duties Beyond Airport Security
Audit finds NSA violated ‘thousands’ of its own privacy rules
American Expat Taxpayers Would Rather Ditch Citizenship Than Face New IRS Rules
U.S. Admits For First Time It Used NSA Surveillance in Criminal Case
Romanian constitutional court puts impeached president back in power
NJ Causes Bridge Jam With Unannounced Lane Closures For 'Study'
Italian showdown with Germany as Enrico Letta rejects 'death by austerity'