[‘Relatively routine’?] “The US Supreme Court announced on Tuesday that it will take up a case examining whether police officers need a warrant before administering an involuntary blood test to a suspected drunk driver. Although the case deals with a relatively routine interaction between police and motorists, the underlying legal issue will help define the scope of Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches involving forced blood tests.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
(Visited 58 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Removal of Berlin Wall temporarily halted due to protests
China central bank warns banks against use of bitcoin
Bitcoin is not just digital currency. It's Napster for finance.
David Crane's Green Vision For Carbon-Belching NRG Energy
Tax Cuts Feed China’s Consuming Passion
China Central Bank Warns Banks on Liquidity
Judge orders trial in allegedly missing Oklahoma City bombing video case
Wisconsin Education Officials Want Students to Wear ‘White Privilege’ Wristbands
Rocky Mountain high: Pot a $200M industry in Colorado
Bitcoin start-up calls out Commonwealth Bank on accounts suspended without warning or explanation
Marc Rich, King Of Commodities, Dead At 78
German Intelligence Worked Closely with NSA on Data Surveillance
U. of California economist says real US debt $70 trillion, not $16 trillion
Dismantle the euro, says Nobel-winning economist who backed it
First Professional Accounting Firms in North America Accept Bitcoins